IMPROVING OF STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH MONOPOLY GAME IN NEW NORMAL ERA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v12i1.10595Keywords:
Monopoly Game, Speaking Ability, Speaking Achievement, teaching SpeakingAbstract
This research aimed to prove improvement towards students’ speaking achievement through the Monopoly Game of the class X-5 students of ITP Surabaya in the year of study 2022/2023. Their poor speaking skills were the issue. Therefore, the researcher conducted a fun treatment during classroom activities in teaching speaking through Monopoly Game. The method of this study was Classroom Action Research.. The actions was done in two cycles. The data in this study was analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The results showed that Monopoly Game improved students' speaking skills and the improvement was shown in the test result. The percentage of students who passed the test on cycle 1 was 36% and the number of students who passed on cycle 2 rose to 84%. Observation finding showed that the students became more engaged and their activities dominate throughout the learning process. Also, the questionnaire showed students gave positive opinion that said Monopoly Game was made stuudents enjoy during classroom activities. It indicated that through Monopoly Game, the students speaking achievement was improvedReferences
Anisa, K. D., Marmanto, S., & Supriyadi, S. (2020). The effect of Gamification on Students’ Motivation in Learning English. Leksika, 14(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30595/lks.v14i1.5695
Asiri, M. J. (2019). Do teachers’ attitudes, perception of usefulness, and perceived social influences predict their behavioral intentions to use gamification in EFL classrooms? Evidence from the middle east. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.112.122
Azlina, K., Eliwarti, & Novitri. (2015). A Study On The Speaking Ability Of The Second Year Students Of Smk Telkom Pekanbaru. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Riau (JOM FKIP UNRI), 1–13. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/206186-none.pdf
Damayanti, A. (2019). Using Games To Improve Students ’ Speaking Skills. Thesis, ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM SCHOOL OF POSTGRADUATE STUDIES UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA.
Flamboyan, A. G., & Lestari, L. A. (2014). Developing English-Opoly Game as a Medium to Teach the 8 th Graders Speaking Recount Text DEVELOPING ENGLISH-OPOLY GAME AS A MEDIUM TO TEACH THE 8 TH GRADERS SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT Agnesia Gita Flamboyan Lies Amin Lestari. RETAIN., 2(2), 1–7.
Haqiqi, N., & Suprayitno. (2017). Penggunaan Media Monopoli Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Keragaman Ekonomi Di Indonesia Dalam Tema Indahnya Keragaman Di Negeriku Di Kelas Iv Sdn Babatan I/456 Surabaya. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 5(3), 254628.
Harmer, J. (2010). How to Teach English (H. Gomm (ed.); 2nd ed.). Stenton Associates, Saffron Walden, Essex.
Hidayat, F. N. (2022). An Analysis of Trap Monopoly Game in Teaching Speaking. International Journal of English Linguistics, Literature, and Education (IJELLE), 3(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.32585/ijelle.v3i2.2061
Juanda, A. (2016). PENELITIAN TINDAKAN KELAS (Classroom Action Research). In DEEPUBLISH (1st ed.). Deepublish.
Kartikasari, E. (2018). IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY BY USING BOARD GAMES TECHNIQUE AT EIGHTH GRADE OF MTsN 5 PONOROGO IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2018/ 2019 [Education and Teacher Training Faculty, State Institute of Islamic Studies Ponorogo (IAIN)]. https://doi.org/.1037//0033-2909.I26.1.78
Kuang, T. M., Adler, R. W., & Pandey, R. (2021). Creating a modified monopoly game for promoting students’ higher-order thinking skills and knowledge retention. Issues in Accounting Education, 36(3), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.2308/ISSUES-2020-097
Lestari, A. D., & Ningrum, A. S. B. (2022). Active Learning: Monopoly As a Media in Teaching Grammar for Eight Grader Students. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(2), 256. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i2.4894
Masyi’ah, A. N. (2014). Improving the Speaking Ability of Grade Viii C Students of Smp Negeri 3 Depok Yogyakarta Through the Use of Video. 297.
Munawaroh, E., & Nurmalasari, Y. (2021). Resilience After Pandemic : Learning. Psikoeduko: Jurnal Psikologi Edukasi Dan Konseling, 1(2), 1–10.
Purwaningsih, P. M. (2018). THE USE OF MODIFIED MONOPOLY GAME IN TEACHING SPEAKING. http://repository.ump.ac.id/7743/
Rahayu, E. M., & Bandjarjani, W. (2021). Assessment of Indonesian Higher Education Students’ Critical Thinking Based on Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(4), 732–741. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i4.30863
Rahayu, E. M., & Bandjarjani, W. (2022). Blended Learning Model in TEFL Workshop to Students of English Language Education Department: A Case Study. The International English Language Teachers and Lecturers (INELTAL), KnE Social Sciences, Pages, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i7.10650
Rahayu, E. M., & Bhaskoro, P. (2022). Interactive Media Edpuzzle and Its Implementation in Teaching Vocabulary in New Normal Era. Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v9i1.4425
Redjeki, I. S., & Muhajir, R. (2021). Gamification in EFL classroom to support teaching and learning in 21st century. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 6(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v6i1.882
Wahyudi, D. P. (2020). The Effectiveness of Monopoly Game as Media to Enhance 10th Graders Speaking in Descriptive Text. RETAIN., 8(1), 95–103.
Wahyuni, S., & Yulianti, F. (2021). The Use of Guessing Game to Improve Students’ Speaking Skill. IJJE (Indonesian Journal Of English Eduation), 8(2), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v8i2.21679
Wirawati, W. A., Laili, R. N., & Nashir, M. (2022). Post COVID-19 Learning Adaptation: Teachers’ Strategies and Innovations in Teaching English in the Post Pandemic. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 2(3), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.eduline927
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
