THE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY WITH (ICARE) MODEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v6i2.1182Keywords:
ICARE Model, Speaking Accuracy, Fluency, Action ResearchAbstract
The research aimed at finding out the improvement of students’ speaking ability by using Introduction, Connection, Application, Reflection, Extend (ICARE) Model at Class VIII.B in MTs. Muallimin Muhammadiyah Makassar. The method of this research was Classroom Action Research that consisted of two cycles. One cycle consisted of four meeting. It means that there were eight meeting in two cycles. This classroom action research was done at MTs. Muallimin Muhammadiyah Makassar for English subject. As subject in this research was Class VIII.B in Junior High School in 2012-2013 Academic Years with student’s number as about 29 students. Those consist of 29 women. Instruments are speaking test and observation sheet. The findings of this research were the improvement of the students’ speaking ability in terms of speaking accuracy and speaking fluency in which the mean score of diagnostic test was 5.17, the mean score of cycle I was 6.06 and the mean score of cycle II was 7.21. The result above indicated that there was significant improvement of the students’ speaking ability in terms of speaking accuracy and speaking fluency in the application of form Introductioon, Connection, Application, Reflection, Extend (ICARE) Model at class VIII.B in MTs. Muallimin Muhammadiyah Makassar.
References
Byrne, Donn.1976. Teaching Speaking Skill. New Edition. London and New York: Longman.
Decentralized Based Education (DBE). 2006. Integrasi Kecakapan Hidup dalam Pembelajaran. USAID Indonesia.
Decentralized Based Education Three (DBE3). 2006. Increased Relevance of Junior Secondary and Non-Formal Education to Work and Life Skills. SC, AED, IRD. Amerika Serikat.
Direktorat Pendidikan Menengah Umum.1999. Penelitian Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Jakarta: Depdikbud
Ellis, R. 1996. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Emzir. 2008. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Ferrance, Eilleen. 2000. Action Research. New York: Brown University.
Gardner in Val Els, Theo, 1992. Applied Linguistics and the Learning of Foreign Language. London: Edwards Arnold Publisher.
Gay, L.R, 1981. Educational Research; Competencies for Analysis and Application. Columbus: Charcks, E. Merril Publihing Co.
Gronbeck. 2006. Principles of Public Speaking MySpeechLab Series. German: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
Hartoyo. 2006. Meningkatkan Keterampilan Mengungkapkan Monolog Descriptive Lisan Sederhana dengan Menggunakan Sistem ICARE. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Harmer, J. 1983. The Practice of English Language Teaching. London and New York Longman Group.
John, H. Hoover. 1963. Teacher, Parents And Students. Oxford: Oxford University.
Jones, Rhodi. 1989. Speaking and Listening. London: The Bath Press.
Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. 1998. The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Prentice Hall International.
Kunandar. 2011. Langkah Mudah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Sebagai Pengembangan Profesi Guru. Jakarta: PT Rajawali Pers.
Larsen-Freeman, D. 1987. Techniques And Principles In Language Teaching. Oxford : Oxford University.
Layman. 1972. Technique in Testing. New York: Oxford University.
Longman. 1995. Input, Interaction and Second Language Acquisition. In Winitz, S. (Ed.) Native Language and Foreign Language Acquisition. New York: New York Academy of Science.
Manser. 1991. Towards The Use of Focus On Form Instruction In Foreign Language Learning And Teaching In Colombia. Ikala vol.16 no.29 Medellín. Retrieved From http://aprendeenlinea.udea. edu. co on 22 July 2012.
Marcel. 1978. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Englewood CLIFFS. New Jersey. Particehall Inc. Retrieved From http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini on 21 July 2012
Munafath. 2010. The Important of the Speaking Skill. Retrieved from: http://www.esgold.com/speaking/information_gap.html. [on 2 April 2010.
Muslich, Masnur. 2009. Melaksanakan PTK itu Mudah. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Nishimura, K. 2000. Effective ways of communicative instruction in the Japanese EFL classroom : Balancing fluency and accuracy. Retrieved From http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini on 21 July 2012.
Nunan, D. 1998. Teaching Grammar in Context. ELT journal, 52, 101-109.
Oxford learner’s pocket Dictionary. 2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sauvignon. 1998. Combing Form and Meaning. ELT Journal, 51(4),336 344. Retrieved from http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/content/51/4/336.short on 23 July 2012.
Sudjana. 1999. Metode Statistika. Bandung: PT. Gramedia
Webster, 1983. Action Research For Teacher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Widdowson, H. G. 1985. Teaching language as a communication. Oxford: Oxford University press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
