Students' Recognition of Concepts of Reflection and Refraction in Multiple Representational Formats
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v10i2.7639Kata Kunci:
difficulties, inconsistencies, multiple representations, understandingAbstrak
A complete understanding of reflection and refraction is achieved when students can recognize the concepts in different representations such as verbal, mathematical, and ray diagrams. The study explores the inconsistencies and difficulties in the students' understanding of image formation by mirrors and lenses. The primary researcher analyzed data on students' performance on a 20-item test consisting of verbal, mathematical, and ray diagram representation items. Two hundred thirty-one (231) grade 10 students took the test after 52-hour instructions on light reflection and refraction. The test results reveal a recognition of the concepts of image formation better in verbal representation by the students. In addition, chi-square results implied that students had drawn the rays in their ray diagrams of spherical mirrors based on their equivalent understanding of the situation in verbal representation. Inconsistencies in their knowledge of reflection by mirrors and refraction by lenses were identified by the differences in the students' responses to verbal and ray diagram representations and supported by the number of students who correctly answered the same items in these two representations. Inconsistencies with the mirror or lens equation were also determined by comparing the results of the items in mathematical representation. Students are found to have difficulties applying the mirror or lens equation and ray-tracing method in problem situations. These observed inconsistencies and problems in multiple representations imply that students have a poor and incomplete understanding of the topic under study.
Referensi
Adadan, E. (2013). Using multiple representations to promote grade 11 students’ scientific understanding of the particle theory of matter. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1079–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012 9299 -9
Ainsworth, S. (2014). The multiple representations principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd edition). Cambridge university press.
Ashmann, S., Anderson, C. W., & Boeckman, H. (2016). Helping secondary school students develop a conceptual understanding of refraction. Physics Education, 51(4), 45009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/51/ 4/045009
Bancong, H., Sultan, A. D., Subaer, S., & Muris, M. (2019). The Development of Physics Teaching Aids to Demonstrate the Intensity of Blackbody Radiation As a Function of Temperature. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v7i1.1719
Cao, J., He, X., Yang, C., Chen, S., Li, Z., & Wang, Z. (2022). Multi-Source and Multi-Representation Adaptation for Cross-Domain Electroencephalography Emotion Recognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(January), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.809459
Creswell, W. J., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications Inc.
De Cock, M. (2012). Representation use and strategy choice in physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020117
Fatmaryanti, S. D., Suparmi, Sarwanto, & Ashadi. (2016). Student representation of magnetic field concepts in learning by guided inquiry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 755(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/ 1/011001
Gao, L., Xu, K., Wang, H., & Peng, Y. (2022). Multi-representation knowledge distillation for audio classification. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 81(4), 5089–5112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-116 10-8
Heikkinen, L., Savinainen, A., & Saarelainen, M. (2016). Virtual Ray Tracing as a Conceptual Tool for Image Formation in Mirrors and Lenses. The Physics Teacher, 54(9), 538–540. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4967893
Kaewkhong, K., Mazzolini, A., Emarat, N., & Arayathanitkul, K. (2010). Thai high-school students’ misconceptions about and models of light refraction through a planar surface. Physics Education, 45(1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/45/1/012
Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2005). Student representational competence and self-assessment when solving physics problems. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.1.010104
Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2008). Patterns of multipe representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010111
Kuo, Y.-R., Won, M., Zadnik, M., Siddiqui, S., & Treagust, D. F. (2017). Learning optics with multiple representations: not as simple as expected. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, H. E. Fischer (Eds), Multiple representations in physics education (pp. 123–138). Springer.
Meltzer, D. E. (2005). Relation between students’ problem-solving performance and representational format. American Journal of Physics, 73(5), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1862636
Mizayanti, Halim, A., Safitri, R., & Nurfadilla, E. (2020). The development of multi representation practicum modules with PhET in Hooke’s law concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/ 1/012124
Opfermann, M., Schmeck, A., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). Multiple representations in physics and science education–why should we use them? In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, H. E. Fischer (Eds), Multiple representations in physics education (pp. 1–22). Springer.
Özdemir, E., Coramik, M., & Ürek, H. (2020). Determination of conceptual understanding levels related to optics concepts: The case of opticianry. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 8(1), 53–54. https://doi.org/10.46328/IJEMST.V8I1.728
Rasmawan, R. (2020). Development of multi-representation based electronic book on inter molecular forces (IMFs) concept for prospective chemistry teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 747–762. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13446a
Resita, I., & Ertikanto, C. (2018). Designing electronic module based on learning content development system in fostering students’ multi representation skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1022(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1022/1/012025
Şengören, S. K. (2014). Prospective physics teachers’use of multiple representations for solving the image formation problems. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/14.13.59
Siswanto, J., Susantini, E., & Jatmiko, B. (2018). Multi-representation based on scientific investigation for enhancing students’ representation skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983 /1/012034
Suarsana, I. M. (2021). Developing interactive digital mathematics book with multi representation approach for deaf students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(13), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i13.22459
Theasy, Y., Wiyanto, & Sujarwata. (2018). Multi-representation ability of students on the problem solving physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1 /012005
Treagust, D. F., Duit, R., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). Multiple representations in physics education (Vol. 10). Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-58914-5
Tural, G. (2015). Cross-grade comparison of students’ conceptual understanding with lenses in geometric optics. Science Education International, 26(3), 325–343.
Verwey, W. B., Wright, D. L., & Immink, M. A. (2021). A multi-representation approach to the contextual interference effect: effects of sequence length and practice. Psychological Research, 86(4), 1310–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01543-0
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Copyright:
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licence:
Authors are free to:
1. Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
2. Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the authors follow the license terms, which include the following:
1. Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
2. ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
3. No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
