Developing Higher Order Thinking Laboratory (Hot-Lab) to Promote General Scientific Reasoning of Student-Teachers in Physics Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i2.10393Kata Kunci:
higher order thinking, laboratory, practical guideline, scientific reasoningAbstrak
This study aims to develop physics practicum guidelines that can improve students' scientific reasoning. The development of practicum guidelines in this study was based on the principles of the Higher Order Thinking Laboratory (HOT-Lab). Using the ADDIE design, which consists of five stages: analyze, design, develop, implement, and evaluate, general physics practicum guidelines are developed in three parts, namely pre-practicum, lab, and post-practicum. The participants involved consisted of two groups: five experts and 88 students taking general physics courses. The pre-practicum stage is the part that distinguishes this practicum guideline from conventional practicum guidelines, where students are presented with "real-world problems" and opportunities to make hypotheses. The results showed that the practicum guideline products developed were deemed feasible and effective for developing students' scientific reasoning. This study shows that students' scientific reasoning for using practicum guidelines based on HOT-Lab principles is significantly higher than those who use conventional practicum guidelines. In conclusion, the guideline developed was valid, feasible, and effective in improving students’ scientific reasoning. This study recommends considering the features of the HOT-Lab practicum activities to be used for similar practicum activities in other places or relevant courses.Referensi
Aoyagi, K., Ishii, K., Shibata, A., Arai, H., Fukamachi, H., & Oka, K. (2020). A qualitative investigation of the factors perceived to influence student motivation for school-based extracurricular sports participation in Japan. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 624–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1700139
Asniar. (2016). Profil penalaran ilmiah dan kemampuan berargumentasi mahasiswa sains dan non-sains. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 2(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v2i1.428.
Bancong, H., & Subaer (2013). Profil penalaran logis berdasarkan gaya berpikir dalam memecahkan masalah fisika peserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2(2), 195-202. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v2i2.2723.
Bao, L., Koenig, K., Xiao, Y., Fritchman, J., Zhou, S., & Chen, C. (2022). Theoretical model and quantitative assessment of scientific thinking and reasoning. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010115
Bicak, B. E., Borchert, C. E., & Höner, K. (2021). Measuring and fostering preservice chemistry teachers’ scientific reasoning competency. Education Sciences, 11(9), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090496
Bintiningtiyas, N., & Lutfi, A. (2016). Pengembangan permainan varmintz chemistry sebagai media pembelajaran pada materi sistem periodik unsur. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 5(2), 302–308. https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v5n2.p%25p
Borich, G. D. (2008). Observation skills for effective teaching (The fifth edition). Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Cuperman, D., & Verner, I. M. (2019). Fostering analogical reasoning through creating robotic models of biological systems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9750-4
Cwik, S., & Singh, C. (2022). Not feeling recognized as a physics person by instructors and teaching assistants is correlated with female students’ lower grades. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010138
Erlina, N., Susantini, E., Wasis., Wicaksono, I., & Pandiangan, P. (2018). The effectiveness of evidence-based reasoning in inquiry-based physics teaching to increase students’ scientific reasoning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6), 972–985. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.972
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th Edition). SAGE Publications.
Göhner, M., & Krell, M. (2020). Preservice science teachers’ strategies in scientific reasoning: The case of modeling. Research in Science Education, 52, 395-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09945-7
Graaf, J. V. D., Sande, E. V. D., Gijsel, M., & Segers, E. (2019). A combined approach to strengthen children’s scientific thinking: Direct instruction on scientific reasoning and training of teacher’s verbal support. International Journal of Science Education, 41(9), 1119–1138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1594442
Hrouzková, T., & Richterek, L. (2021). Lawson classroom test of scientific reasoning at entrance university level. Proceedings of the 4th International Baltic Symposium on Science and Technology Education, 74-85. https://doi.org/10.33225/BalticSTE/2021.74
Hung, C. Y., Sun, J. C. Y., & Yu, P. T. (2015). The benefits of a challenge: Student motivation and flow experience in tablet-PC-game-based learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(2), 172–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.997248
Kant, J. M., Scheiter, K., & Oschatz, K. (2017). How to sequence video modeling examples and inquiry tasks to foster scientific reasoning. Learning and Instruction, 52, 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.04.005
Karatay, R., Doğan, F., & Şahi̇n, Ç. (2014). Determination of atitudes of preservice teachers towards laboratory practices. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 10(3), 703–722.
Khoirina, M., Cari, C., & Sukarmin. (2018). Identify students’ scientific reasoning ability at senior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012024
Klemm, J., Flores, P., Sodian, B., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2020). Scientific reasoning in biology – the impact of domain-general and domain-specific concepts on children’s observation competency. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01050
Koes-H, S., & Putri, N. D. (2021). The effect of project-based learning in STEM on students’ scientific reasoning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1835, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012006
Krell, M., Dawborn-Gundlach, M., & Driel, J. V. (2020). Scientific reasoning competencies in science teaching. Teaching Science, 66(2), 32-42.
Kurbanoglu, İ., & Takunyaci, M. (2021). A structural equation modeling on relationship between self-efficacy, physics laboratory anxiety and attitudes. Journal of Family, Counseling and Education, 6(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.32568/jfce.866649
Kwon, Y. J., & Lawson, A. E. (2000). Linking brain growth with the development of scientific reasoning ability and conceptual change during adolescence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(200001)37:1<44::aid-tea4>3.0.co;2-j
Lawson, A. E. (1978). The development and validation of a classroom test of formal reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660150103
Lawson, A. E., Lawson, D. I., & Lawson, C. A. (1984). Proportional reasoning and the linguistic abilities required for hypothetico-deductive reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660210204
Mahler, D., Bock, D., & Bruckermann, T. (2021). Preservice biology teachers’ scientific reasoning skills and beliefs about nature of science: how do they develop and is there a mutual relationship during the development?. Education Sciences, 11(9), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090558
Malik, A., & Setiawan, A. (2016). The Development of higher order thinking laboratory to improve transferable skills of students. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Innovation in Engineering and Vocational Education. 36-40. https://doi.org/10.2991/icieve-15.2016.9
Malik, A., Setiawan, A., Suhandi, A., Permanasari, A., Samsudin, A., Dirgantara, Y., Suhendi, H. Y., Sari, I. M., & Hermita, N. (2019). The development of higher order thinking laboratory (hotlab) model related to heat transfer topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1204, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1204/1/012060
Mariana, N., Siahaan, P., & Utari, S. (2018). Scientific reasoning profile of junior secondary school students on the concept of static fluid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012056
Marušić, M., & Dragojević, A. (2020). Assessing pharmacy students’ scientific reasoning after completing a physics course taught using active-learning methods. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(8), 1112-1122. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7610
Masters, H., & Docktor, J. (2022). Preservice teachers’ abilities and confidence with constructing scientific explanations as scaffolds are faded in a physics course for educators. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(7), 786-813. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.2004641
May, J. M., Barth-Cohen, L. A., Gerton, J. M., Grandi, C. D., & Adams, A. L. (2022). Student sensemaking about inconsistencies in a reform-based introductory physics lab. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020134
Nieminen, P., Savinainen, A., & Viiri, J. (2012). Relations between representational consistency, conceptual understanding of the force concept, and scientific reasoning. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010123
Omarchevska, Y., Lachner, A., Richter, J., & Scheiter, K. (2022). Do video modeling and metacognitive prompts improve self-regulated scientific inquiry?. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 1025-1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09652-3
Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., Petitt, D. N., & Forbes, C. T. (2021). Exploring undergraduates’ breadth of socio-scientific reasoning through domains of knowledge. Research in Science Education, 52, 1643-1658 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10014-w
Parmin, P., Khusniati, M., El Islami, R. A. Z., Deta, U. A., & Saregar, A. (2022). Online scientific argumentation strategy on improving pre-service science teachers’ scientific reasoning through experiment activity: A case study in Indonesia. Perspectives of Science and Education, 55(1), 607–619. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2022.1.39
Safitri, D., Setiawan, A., Suhandi, A., Malik, A., Lisdiani, S. A. S., & Sapriadil. (2019). The effects of higher order thinking (HOT) laboratory design in hooke law on student’s creative thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1204, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1204/1/012037
Santiani. (2013). Kemampuan keterampilan proses sains mahasiswa fisika STAIN Palangka Raya pada praktikum fisika dasar I. Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematika, 1(2), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v1i2.9
Sapriadil, S., Setiawan, A., Suhandi, A., Malik, A., Safitri, D., Lisdiani, S. A. S., & Hermita, N. (2018). Optimizing students’ scientific communication skills through higher order thinking virtual laboratory (HOTVL). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012050
Sapriadil, S., Setiawan, A., Suhandi, A., Malik, A., Safitri, D., Lisdiani, S. A. S., & Hermita, N. (2019). Effect of higher order thinking virtual laboratory (HOTVL) in electric circuit on students’ creative thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1204, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1204/1/012025
Setiawan, A., Malik, A., Suhandi, A., & Permanasari, A. (2018). Effect of higher order thinking laboratory on the improvement of critical and creative thinking skills. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 306, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/306/1/012008
Setya, W., Agustina, R. D., Putra, R. P., Prihatini, S., Hidayatulloh, R., Isnaeni, P. S., & Malik, A. (2021). Implementation of higher order thinking laboratory (HOTLAB) on magnetic field with real blended virtual laboratory to improve students critical thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2098, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2098/1/012019
Shi, W. Z., Ma, L., & Wang, J. (2020). Effects of inquiry-based teaching on chinese university students’ epistemologies about experimental physics and learning performance. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.289
Suryadi, A., Yuliati, L., & Wisodo, H. (2020). Students’ scientific reasoning on temperature and heat topic: A comparative study of students in urban and rural area. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 4(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v4i1.4122
Sutarno, S., Setiawan, A., Kaniawati, I., & Suhandi, A. (2019). The development of higher order thinking virtual laboratory on photoelectric effect. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032034
Vo, D. V., & Csapó, B. (2022). Measuring inductive reasoning in school contexts: A review of instruments and predictors. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 31(4), 506-525. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2022.123179
Wenning, C. J., Khan, M. A., & Khan, G. (2011). Levels of inquiry model of science teaching: Learning sequences to lesson plans. Journal of Physics Teachers Education Online, 6(2), 17-20.
Wilujeng, I., & Wibowo, H. A. C. (2021). Penalaran ilmiah mahasiswa calon guru fisika dalam pembelajaran daring. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 1(2), 46-54. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v1i2.1025
Wong, S. S. H., Kim, M., & Jin, Q. (2021). Critical literacy practices within problem-based learning projects in science. Interchange, 52, 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-021-09426-4
Yediarani, R. D., Maison, M., & Syarkowi, A. (2019). Scientific reasoning abilities profil of junior high school students in Jambi. Indonesian Journal of Science and Education, 3(1), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijose.v3i1.627
Zulkipli, Z. A. (2020). Identifying scientific reasoning skills of science education students. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 275-280. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.10311
Unduhan
File Tambahan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Copyright:
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licence:
Authors are free to:
1. Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
2. Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the authors follow the license terms, which include the following:
1. Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
2. ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
3. No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
