INFERENCE STRATEGY TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ LITERAL COMPREHENSION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v3i2.839Abstrak
The purpose of this research was to find out the improvement of the students’ comprehension in literal comprehension by using Inference Strategy at the second-year students’ of SMA YAPIP Sungguminasa Gowa. As has been stated in the previous chapter, the present research investigated the use of Inference Strategy to improve students’ reading comprehension in literal and interpretative comprehension. The research employed a pre-experimental design in SMA YAPIP Sungguminasa Gowa. Therefore, the findings and discussion in the previous chapter, the researcher conclude as Inference Strategy can improve the students’ reading comprehension in literal comprehension. It was proved by 74% of improvement which indicates that post-test value was higher than the pre-test while pre-test was 47, 73 and posttest 83, 22.
Keywords: comprehension, literal, reading, inference strategy
Referensi
Abidin, Zainal. 2006. The effectiveness of SAVI (Somatic, Auditory, Visual, and Intellectual) As a Reading Method. Thesis S1 FKIP Unismuh Makassar.
Ackey, Elizabeth. 1986. Macmillan English. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Aidil. 2008. Improving Reading Comprehension through Herringbone Technique of the first year student of MA Muhammadiyah Sibatua Pangkajene. Thesis S1 FKIP Unismuh Makassar.
Bailey, Eileen.2000. Making Inferences, Improving Reading Comprehension for Students with Dyslexia: South Dakota Department of Education. ( HTTP: www. Making Inference/ pdf.// )
Burn, C. Paul. 1987. Teaching Reading in Today is Elementary School. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Carri Illo W, Lawrence, 1976. Teaching Reading. NewYork: St. Martin Press
Clewell, Suzanne. 2009, Activating Prior Knowledge. http://www.thinkport.org/ career/strategies/reading/activate.tp.
Cooper, J. David. 1986. Improving reading comprehension. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Cresswell, John W. 2008. Education Research. British: Pearson Education, Inc
Dahniar. 2011. Using Reciprocal Teaching Strategy in Improving the Students’ Reading Comprehension at X.5 of SMA Negeri 1 Bajeng Kabupaten Gowa. Thesis FKIP Unismuh Makassar.
Daniel J. Kurland. 2000. Inference: Reading Ideas as Well as Words. Retrieved January 28, 2009, from http://yahoo.com
Eileen. 2006. Notes. (n.d.). Greece Central School District, New York. Retrieved May 31, 2006, from http://www.greece.k12.ny.us/instruction/ela/6-12/Tools/inferencenotes.pdf
Emba. 2007. The Effectiveness of Pre-Reading Plan Strategy in Improving Student’s Reading Comprehension at the tenth years' students of SMA Muhammadiyah 9 Makassar. Thesis S1 FKIP Unismuh Makassar.
Gehbranejad, Fatenah et.al. 2013. The effect of word contextualization On Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners Reading Comprehension Ability. Iran: Izlami Azad University
Gay, L.R. 1981. Education Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. U.S.A: Charles E. Merill publishing co.
Grellet, Francoise. 1981. Developing Reading Skills. London: Cambridge.
Hasniar. 2005. Improving Reading Comprehension through Word Attack Skill. Unpublished Thesis. Makassar: State University of Makassar.
http://specialed.about.com/od/readingliteracy/a/makinginferences.htm
Idil. 2012. Improving Reading Comprehension through Rider Strategy at the second-grade student of SMP PGRI Sungguminasa, Gowa. Thesis S1 FKIP Unismuh Makassar.
Iqbal, Muhammad. 2011. Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension through CALL “Computer-Assisted Language Learning”. A thesis. Makassar: Makassar Muhammadiyah University
Kirszern & Mandell. 1980. The pattern for language Writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Marzono, R. (2010). Teaching inference. Educational Leadership, 67(7), 80-01. Available online at http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational leadership/apr10/vol67/num07/Teaching-Inference.aspx.
Misiak, Sure. 2005. Making Inferences. London: English Language Arts
Misiak, Sure. 2007. Making Inferences. Retrieved February 18, 2009, from http://www.strategyeach.aspx.htm#suemisiak.html
Modified 2003, Nov 6.Making Inferences and Drawing Conclusions. Staff Writer: Cuesta College, from http://specialed.about.com/od/readingliteracy/a/makinginferences.htm
Nurmala, Lia. 2008. Improving the Students Vocabulary Achievement Through The Use of STAD Method. Thesis S1 FKIP Unismuh Makassar.
Oshima, A & Hogue, A. 1997. Introduction to Academic Writing, 2ed ed. New York: Logman.
Pollard, Dianne. 2007. Rubric Assesment of Reading. www.teach-nology.com. Retrieved on September 3nd 2011.
Prezler, June. 2006. Strategies to Help Readers Make Meaning Through Inferences. Rapid City: South Dakota Department of Education.
Rahmadani, Nur. 2007. Improving English Students Achievement through Cooperative Learning at the First-Year Students of SMAN 2 Sungguminasa. Thesis S1 FKIP Unismuh Makassar.
Rani, Nur Aisyah. 2003. The Correlation between Reading Speed and Comprehension of the Sixth Semester Students of English Department of Tarbiyah Faculty at IAIN Alauddin Makassar.
Roell, Kelly.2011. How to Find the main idea in reading a passage. Retrieved from:http://testprep.about.com/od/tipsfortresting/a/main_idea.htm. Accessed on July 10, 2014.
Smith. 2004. Tips for Drawing Inference. Staff Writer: Cuesta College, from http://specialed.about.com/od/readingliteracy/a/makinginferences.htm
Smith, B. Nila. & Alah, H. Robinson. 1980. Reading Instruction for Today Children. Boston: Prentice Hall Inc.
Wahyuni. 2006. The Application of Reciprocal Strategy in Reading Comprehension. Makassar: Thesis FKIP Unismuh Makassar
Yen-Chi Fan. 2010. The Effect of Comprehension Strategy Instruction on EFL Learners Reading Comprehension. Taiwan: I show University.
Zwiers, Jeff. (2005). Building reading comprehension habits in grades. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
