USING COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING (CLT) APPROACH THROUGH SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION AS A DEVICE TO STIMULATE THE STUDENTS TO SPEAK IN ENGLISH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v1i2.774Abstrak
This study was conducted to find out whether or not the using of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) Approach through Small Group Discussion effective to stimulate the students to speak in English than the conventional way, and also to improve the teacher awareness to use an effective approach in teaching English, especially in teaching speaking skill. This study employed a Pre-Experimental research method with One Group Pre-test and Post-test Design. The data obtained from the test was analyzed quantitatively and then it’s result was compared with the questionnaire to know whether the students interested in learning speaking by using Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) Approach or not. The mean score obtained from Pre-test was 2, 84 and post-test were 6, 01. The data showed that the student’s speaking skills in post-test were higher than the pre-test. The data obtained from questionnaire showed the mean score 78, 67. It means that the students were highly interested in the application of speaking materials through Communicative Language Teaching Approach through small group discussion.
Keyword: Communicative Language Teaching Approach, Small Group discussion, speaking.
Referensi
Cheet, Mayers. 1993 Collaborated Learning New Jersey: Laidlaw Brothers Company.
Sauvignon S.J. 1997. Communicative Competence Theory and Classroom Practice. New York Mac Grow Hill.
DEPDIKNAS, 2005. “Assessment and Evaluation” diklat Manajemen Sekolah Bagi Kepala Sekolah/wakil SMK, Guru Matematika dan Bahasa Inggris.
Harmer Jeremy, 1991. Gay 1981The Practice of English Language Teaching. Longman.
Layman, 1972. Technique in Testing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gay.L.R.1981 Educational Research: competency for analysis and application. Florida: A Belt and Howell Company.
Marcel.1978 English Speaking Elements. Last update June, 12th 2006 Available on: http://eng.udu.gsu.edu /mos-dos/9.html.
Pesola.C.AD 1995 Background. Design and Evaluation of a Conceptual Framework for FLESH Curriculum. Brown and Company. Boston, Toronto.
Rasyid, MA. 1998. The Teaching of Speaking to the First Semester Students of English at IKIP Ujung Pandang. Unpublished Thesis PPS. UNHAS.
Richard, Jack C., And Rodgers, Theodore S. 1995. Approach and Method in Language Teaching. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Scarcella R, and Oxford 1992. The Tapestry of Language Learning: Boston: Heinle.
Soba. 2005. Building up The Students Speaking Performance through Guided Dialogue. Unpublished Thesis PPS. UNM.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
