USING PADLET TO INCREASE THE STUDENTS’ PROCEDURE TEXT WRITING ACHIEVEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v9i2.3970Keywords:
Padlet, Writing Achievement, Procedure Text, Classroom Action ResearchAbstract
The purpose of this research was to improve the Students’ procedure text writing achievement at English Conversation Club (ECC) MAN Kota Blitar by applying Padlet. The research design used was classroom action research (CAR) which covered 4 steps; 1) Planning, 2) Acting, 3) Observing and evaluating and 4) Reflecting. The Subjects of this research were 50 students from X Grade who join ECC in MAN Kota Blitar.The data collection methods of this research were taken from administering tests and distributing the questionnaire. The research result proved that the use of Padlet for teaching writing of procedure text could increase the students’ writing achievement of procedure text from preliminary action 57.55 increased to 72.85 in cycle 1. Based on the result of cycle 1, it did not fulfill the minimum criterion mastery 75.00; therefore, the researchers continued the research to cycle 2 and got satisfying result 82.65. Furthermore, the students’ of ECC MAN Kota Blitar also presented positive attitude toward the use of Padlet in teaching and learning writing of procedure text.
References
Awaludin, F. A., Abd Karim, R., & Mohd Saad, N. H. (2017). Padlet: A Digital Collaborative Tool for Academic Writing. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 8(1), 179–184.
Fadhilawati & Sari. (2018). Embedding Various Digital Technologies in English Teaching and Learning To Improve Students ’ Vocabulary and Writing. 5(December), 170–184.
Farah Nasser Algraini. (2016). The Effect of Using Padlet on Enhancing EFL Writing Performance. Arab World English Journal Theses / Dissertation. Retrieved from www.awej.org
Fuchs, B. (2014). The writing is on the wall: Using Padlet for whole-class engagement. University of Kentucky UKnowledge, 240(4), 1–9. Retrieved from https://uknowledge.uky.edu/libraries_facpub%0Ahttps://uknowledge.uky.edu/libraries_facpub%0Ahttps://uknowledge.uky.edu/libraries_facpub
Haris, M., Yunus, M., & Badusah., J. (2017). the Effectiveness of Using Padlet in Esl Classroom. International Journal of Advanced Research, 5(2), 783–788. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/3214
Jaganathan, S. (2016). Global English-Oriented Research Journal ( G E O R J ). (April).
June, M., Warner, W., & Ferguson, A. (2016). The Agricultural. 88(6), 1–28.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. In The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
Lestari, P. Y., & Kurniawan, E. H. (2018). Padlet as Media to Improve Writing Mastery of English Department Students of Uniska 2015-2016. English Franca : Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v2i1.373
Wardani, I., & Waris, A. (2014). Improving The ability In Writing Descriptive Text Through Guided-Question Technique. Journal of English Language Teaching Society (ELTS), 2(1), 1–13. Retrieved from http://mmursyidpw.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/learning-description.pdf
Weller, A. (2013). The use of Web 2.0 technology for pre-service teacher learning in science education. Research in Teacher Education, 3(2), 40–46.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
