ANALISIS BUTIR SOAL MATERI GEOMETRI KELAS V SD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/sigma.v14i2.9495Kata Kunci:
Item analysis, validity, reliability, level of difficulty, discriminatory power.Abstrak
This research is a descriptive research that aims to determine the quality of the items in the mathematics subject subject Geometry students at SDN 012 Tambak. The subjects in this study were practice questions in class V mathematics. The data from this research were obtained by collecting data in the form of daily math practice questions and answer sheets for class V students. The data analysis technique was quantitative descriptive data analysis. Based on the results of data analysis, in terms of content validity it is a valid item because it has rcount greater than rtabel at a significant level of 5%, in terms of overall reliability it is reliable with a distribution of 4 items of moderate reliability and 1 item of high reliability, in terms of difficulty level has a disproportionate distribution of difficulty level comparisons because there are more easy questions than moderate questions and there are no difficult items so that they are not in accordance with the comparison between easy-medium-difficult questions, and in terms of discriminating power most of them have discriminating power very good item.
Referensi
Agustin, N. (2019). Analisis Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Ditinjau dari Tingkat Kesukaran dan Daya Pembeda pada Kelas VIII Di SMP Islam Terpadu Bina Insani Metro. Skripsi.
Aiken, L. R. (1994). Psychological Testing and Assessment.
Amalia, N. R., Halik, A., & Mukhlisa, N. (2021). Analisis Butir Soal Matematika Pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Pinisi Journal of Education, 1(1), 219–230. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/PJE/article/view/25840
Arifin, Z. (2014). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung.
Asrul, Ananda, R., & Rosinta. (2014). Evaluasi Pembajalaran. In Ciptapustaka Media.
Matondang Zulkifli , Djulia Ely, Sriadhi, S. J. (2019). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar (I. Muhammad (ed.); 1st ed.). Yayasan Kita menulis.
Nuryadi & Khuzaini, N. (2016). Evaluasi Hasil Dan Proses Pembelajaran Matematika. Yogyakarta: PT Leutika Nouvalitera.
Ratnawulan, &. R. (2014). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Setiawan, D. F. (2018). Prosedur Evaluasi dalam Pembelajaran (N. F. Subekti (ed.); 1st ed.). Deeppublish.
Soegiarto, E. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian dan Penulisan Ilmiah. Indocamp.
Suharsimi, A. (2013). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan edisi 2. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Syarif, E. A., & Syamsurizal, S. (2019). Analyzed Quality of Senior High School Biology Olympiad Questions at West Sumatera, Riau, Jambi, and Bengkulu in 2018. Bioeducation Journal, 3(2), 142–150. https://doi.org/10.24036/bioedu.v3i2.194
Uno, H. B., & Lamatenggo, N. (2016). Tugas guru dalam pembelajaran. In Bumi Aksara (p. 198).
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
With the receipt of the article by the SIGMA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Editorial Board and the decision to be published, then the copyright regarding the article will be diverted to SIGMA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.
Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar as the publisher of SIGMA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika hold the copyright regarding all the published articles in this journal.Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar has the right to multiply and distribute the article and every author is not allowed to publish the same article that was published in this journal.
The manuscript authentic and copyright statement submission can be downloaded ON THIS FORM.
