An Assessment to Measure Problem-Solving Ability and Science Process Skills: A Feasibility Test
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v13i1.15654Kata Kunci:
assessment, feasibility test, problem-solving ability, science process skillsAbstrak
The ability to solve problems and apply scientific processes is a critical component of 21st-century education, especially within the context of the Indonesian "Merdeka" curriculum, which promotes independent and adaptive learning. However, traditional assessment methods fail to capture these competencies adequately. This study aims to determine the feasibility of an assessment instrument designed to measure high school students' problem-solving ability and science process skills. The instrument was developed using Istiyono’s test development model and focused on the test trial stage, which involves expert validation, empirical analysis, reliability testing, and item difficulty analysis. Using Istiyono’s model, the development focused on expert validation, empirical testing, and item analysis. A total of 252 students from six high schools in Yogyakarta and surrounding regions participated in the study. The content validity was assessed using Aiken's V, showing all items to be valid. Content validity, evaluated using Aiken’s V, indicated all items were valid. Empirical validation using the QUEST program yielded INFIT MNSQ values of 0.99 ± 0.81 for problem-solving and 1.01 ± 0.21 for science process skills, confirming item validity. Reliability coefficients ranged from 0.61 to 0.97, indicating high reliability. The difficulty level of items was distributed across easy, medium, and difficult categories. These findings support the feasibility of the assessment instrument in evaluating students’ higher-order thinking skills. The findings demonstrated the instrument’s suitability for assessing complex cognitive and inquiry-based skills. The validated instrument offers practical implications for educators to improve learning through formative assessment aligned with curriculum goals.Referensi
Abidin, A. Z., Istiyono, E., Fadilah, N., & Dwandaru, W. S. B. (2019). A computerized adaptive test for measuring the physics critical thinking skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(3), 376–383. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3.19642
Agnezi, L. A., & Festiyed. (2023). Development of the online assessment instrument for fluid, temperature, and heat to measure the problem solving skills of high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2582, 1-10. Doi. 10.1088/1742-6596/2582/1/012053
Alika, M. F., Darsono, T., Linuwih, S. (2018). Pengembangan soal model pisa untuk mengukur kemampuan bepikir tingkat tinggi siswa smp pada materi pemanasan global. Upej: Unnes Physics Education Journal, 7(3), 58-65. https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v7i3.27678
Anggraena, Y., Ginanto, D., Felicia, N., Andiarti, A., Herutami, I., Alhapip, L., Iswoyo, S., Hartini, Y., Mahardika, R. L. (2022). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, Dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.
Fadilah, J., Ainirohmah, N., Marwaziah, N., Hafizah, N., Hayu, S. R., Andrian, D., Nofriyandi, N., & Indriati, M. (2024). Students' creative thinking ability profile in mathematics lessons of Riau Province. Mathematics Research and Education Journal, 8(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.25299/mrej.2024.vol8(1).16823
Gamage, S. H. P. W., Ayres, J. R., Behrend, M. B., & Smith, E. J. (2019). Optimising moodle quizzes for online assessments. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0181-4
González-Salamanca, J. C., Agudelo, O. L., & Salinas, J. (2020). Key competences, education for sustainable development and strategies for the development of 21st century skills. A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(24), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410366
Hardiansyah, F., Misbahudholam, A. R. M., & Hidayatillah, Y. (2022). IPAS learning assessment to measure science process skill in elementary school. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6(4), 612–623. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v6i4.54217
Indarta, Y., Jalinus, N., Waskito, W., Samala, A. D., Riyanda, A. R., & Adi, N. H. (2022). Relevansi kurikulum merdeka belajar dengan model pembelajaran abad 21 dalam perkembangan era society 5.0. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(2), 3011–3024. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2589
Istiyono, E., Dwandaru, W. S. B., Permatasari, A. K., & Aristiawan. (2020). Developing computer based test to assess students’ problem-solving in physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012060
Istiyono, E. (2020). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian dan analisis hasil belajar fisika dengan teori tes klasik dan modern. UNY Press.
Kadir, H. D., Arsyad, M., & Marisda, D. H. (2020). Implementation of problem solving methods in elasticity course implementasi metode pemecahan masalah pada materi elastisitas. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(3), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v8i3.3803
Langoday, Y. R., Nurrahma, N., & Rijal, Syamsul. (2024). Policy reflection: Kurikulum merdeka as educational innovation in the era of society 5.0. Edunesia : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 5(2), 957–978. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v5i2.915
Mabsutsah, N., & Yushardi, Y. (2022). Analisis kebutuhan guru terhadap e module berbasis steam dan kurikulum merdeka pada materi pemanasan global. Jurnal Pendidikan Mipa, 12(2), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v12i2.588
Malhotra, R., Massoudi, M., Jindal, R. (2023). Shifting from traditional engineering education towards competency-based approach: The most recommended approach-review. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 9081-9111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11568-6
Masoleh, S. M. T., Poushaneh, K., Babadi, A. K., & Zaheh, H. R. R. (2023). Citizenship education curriculum for students with special needs. International Journal of Learning Spaces Studies (IJLSS), 1(2), 44-54. https://doi.org/10.22034/lss.2023.175772
Muslim, S. S. (2016). Penggunaan asesmen autentik dalam discovery learning untuk meningkatkan penguasaan konsep dan keterampilan proses sains siswa pada materi pemanasan global. Thesis. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Rismorlita, C. E., Philiyanti, F., Prasetio, V. M., & Sari, L. P. (2021). Relevansi kebutuhan stakeholder terhadap pengembangan kurikulum berbasis keterampilan abad 21. Kagami: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Bahasa Jepang, 12(2), 12-20.
Sari, D. P., Darhim., & Rosjanuardi, R. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian untuk mengukur kemampuan representasi matematis siswa SMP. Indonesian Digital Journal of Mathematics and Education, 4(7), 421–429.
Sari, I. P., Mustikasari, V. R., & Pratiwi, N. (2019). Pengintegrasian penilaian formatif dalam pembelajaran IPA berbasis saintifik terhadap pemahaman konsep peserta didik. Jipva (Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Veteran), 3(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.31331/jipva.v3i1.778
Sartini., & Mulyono, R. (2022). Analisis implementasi kurikulum merdeka belajar untuk mempersiapkan pembelajaran abad 21. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 8(2), 1348–1363. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v8i2.392
Setyawarno, D. (2017). Penggunaan aplikasi software iteman (item and test analysis) untuk analisis butir soal pilihan ganda berdasarkan teori tes klasik. Jurnal Ilmu Fisika dan Pembelajarannya (JIFP), 1(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.19109/jifp.v1i1.866
Shepardson, D. P., & Adams, P. E. (1996). Coming to know and understand alternative assessment in science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7(4), 267–282. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43156075
Simarmata, H. A., & Mayuni, I. (2023). Curriculum reform in Indonesia: From competency-based to freedom of learning. International Journal Of Pedagogical Novelty, 2(2), 01-13.
Sufyadi, S., Lambas., Rosdiana, T., Rochim, F. A. N., Novrika, S., Isyowo, S., Hartini, Y., Primadona, M., Mahardhika, R. L. (2021). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen jenjang pendidikan dasar dan menengah (SD/MI, SMP/MTs, SMA/SMK/MA). Kepala Pusat Asesmen Dan Pembelajaran Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi.
Supahar., Rosana, D., Ramadani, M., & Dewi, D. K. (2017). The instrument for assessing the performance of science process skills based on nature of science (Nos). Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXXVII(3), 435–445. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i3.14731
Ramli, W., Arafah, K., & Sari, S. S. (2018). Test instrument development for science process skills in mechanic wave topic for grade XI SMA student. Proceeding Book of 1st International Conference on Educational Assessment and Policy, 1, 37–43.
Tanti., Kurniawan, D. A., Kuswanto., Utami, W., & Wardhana, I. (2020). Science process skills and critical thinking in science: Urban and rural disparity. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(4), 489–498. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.24139
Wibowo, T. E., & Faizah, S. (2021). Pengembangan soal tes untuk mengukur kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa pada materi bentuk aljabar. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.35316/alifmatika.2021.v3i2.145-158
Zeng, W., Huang, F., Yu, L., & Chen, S. (2018). Towards a learning-oriented assessment to improve students’ learning a critical review of literature. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 30, 211-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-018-9281-9
Unduhan
File Tambahan
- An Assessment to Measure Problem Solving Ability and Science Process Skills: A Feasibility Test (Inggris)
- An Assessment to Measure Problem Solving Ability and Science Process Skills: A Feasibility Test (Inggris)
- An Assessment to Measure Problem Solving Ability and Science Process Skills: A Feasibility Test (Inggris)
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Copyright:
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licence:
Authors are free to:
1. Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
2. Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the authors follow the license terms, which include the following:
1. Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
2. ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
3. No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
