The Effect of Static Fluid Pressure Learning with Predict-Observe-Explain (POE)-Oriented Student Worksheets on Science Process Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i3.11842Kata Kunci:
predict-observe-explain, science process skills, static fluid, student worksheetsAbstrak
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of static fluid pressure learning with Predict, Observe, Explain (POE)-oriented student worksheets on the eighth-grade students' science process skills. This research employed a non-equivalent control group design. A total of 166 students from five classes in class VIII at State Junior High School 03 in Bengkulu City represented the research population. Students in class VIII-1 (control group) and class VIII-2 (experimental group), for a total of 58 students, were selected as subjects using non-probability sampling and the convenience sampling method. By applying non-parametric inferential statistics, particularly the Mann-Whitney U test, the hypothesis was examined. The results confirm that the use of POE-oriented worksheets in learning the concept of pressure in static fluids has a statistically positive effect at the significance level (0.05) with a p-value (0.003) on science process skills, and the effect size (r=0.39) is in the medium category. The availability of worksheets that rely on scaffolding strategies such as POE may enable students in secondary schools to construct their own knowledge during the learning process.The provision of worksheets that employ scaffolding techniques, such as the Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) approach, has the potential to facilitate the development of students' knowledge construction and science process abilities in secondary school settings.
Referensi
Algiranto., Sarwanto., & Marzuki, A. (2019). The development of students worksheet based on Predict, Observe, Explain (POE) to improve students’ science process skill in SMA Muhammadiyah Imogiri. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1153, 1-6. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1153/1/012148
Cofré, H., Núñez, P., Santibáñez, D., Pavez, J. M., Valencia, M., & Vergara, C. (2019). A Critical review of students’ and teachers’ understandings of nature of science. Science and Education, 28(3–5), 205–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00051-3
Demir, S. (2022). Comparison of normality tests in terms of sample sizes under different skewness and kurtosis coefficients. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(2), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1101295
Derilo, R. C. (2019). Basic and integrated science process skills acquisition and science achievement of seventh-grade learners. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(1), 281–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2405
Elfeky, A. I. M., Masadeh, T. S. Y., & Elbyaly, M. Y. H. (2020). Advance organizers in flipped classroom via e-learning management system and the promotion of integrated science process skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100622
Gultepe, N., & Kilic, Z. (2015). Effect of scientific argumentation on the development of scientific process skills in the context of teaching chemistry. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(1), 111–132. doi: 10.12973/ijese.2015.234a
Gunawan., Harjono, A., Hermansyah., & Herayanti, L. (2019). Guided inquiry model through virtual laboratory to enhance students’ science process skills on heat concept. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(2), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i2.23345
Ika, Y. E., & Doa, H. (2021). The development of physics students’ worksheets based on science process skills in basic physics course at Flores University. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v9i1.4764
Kim, T. K. (2015). T test a parametric statistic. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 68(6), 540-546. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.6.540
Kurniawan, F., Djukri, D., & Haka, N. B. (2022). The predict-observe-explain model: is it effective to improve science process skills?. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(4), 803–815. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i4.26172
Läkens, D. (2022). Sample size justification. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.33267
Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2013). Meaningful assessment of learners’ understandings about scientific inquiry - The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21125
Mamun, M. A. A., Lawrie, G., & Wright, T. (2020). Instructional design of scaffolded online learning modules for self-directed and inquiry-based learning environments. Computers and Education, 144, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103695
Miller, C. J., Smith, S. N., & Pugatch, M. (2020). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs in implementation research. Psychiatry Research, 283, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.027
Mishra, P., Pandey, C. M., Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C., & Keshri, A. (2019). Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(1), 67–72. doi: 10.4103/aca.aca_157_18
Nurlina, N. (2020). Application of guided inquiry learning model towards science process skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v8i1.3201
Orcan, F. (2020). Parametric or non-parametric: Skewness to test normality for mean comparison. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(2), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.656077
Putri, F. E. (2016). Pengembangan LKS berbasis predict-observe-explain (POE) pada materi fluida statis di sekolah menengah atas. Skripsi. Universitas Lampung.
Ramdayani, R., Latifah, K. M., Yurniwati., & Taofik. (2023). Innovative strategies in science education: Implementing the POE model to enhance elementary school students' science process skills. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 12(1), 25-37. doi: 10.24235/sc.educatia.v12i1.13706
Sanders, K., Sheard, J., Becker, B. A., Eckerdal, A., Hamouda, S., & Simon. (2019). Inferential statistics in computing education research: A methodological review. Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, 19, 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1145/3291279.3339408
Sari, G., Hasan, M., & Mahidin, M. (2020). The development of student worksheet based on predict observe explain to increase students’ conceptual understanding of the reaction rates. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012090
Sudirman, S., & Qaddafi, M. (2023). The application of student worksheets based on PhET simulation to increase the concept understanding in Hooke’s Law. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i1.9505
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology; How to choose a sampling technique for research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 5(2), 18–27.
Tawil, M., Said, M. A., & Suryansari, K. (2023). Exploration of conceptual understanding of science teachers and students: Gap conception of current, voltage in Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 9(1), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.09115
Tilakaratne, C. T. K., & Ekanayake, T. M. S. S. K. Y. (2017). Achievement level of science process skills of junior secondary students: Based on a sample of grade six and seven students from Sri Lanka. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 12(9), 2089–2108.
Widyawati, E. (2020). Pengaruh model process oriented guided inquiry learning terhadap keterampilan proses sains siswa konsep fluida statis (quasi eksperimen di SMA Negeri 28 kabupaten Tangerang tahun ajaran 2019/2020). Skripsi. FTIK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Winton, B. G., & Sabol, M. A. (2022). A multi-group analysis of convenience samples: free, cheap, friendly, and fancy sources. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(6), 861–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1961187
Yulianti, S. H., Juanengsih, N., & Mardiati, Y. (2018). POE learning model: The Effect on student science process skills on the coordination system concept. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 8(1), 1547–1552. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v8n1.p%25p
Unduhan
File Tambahan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Copyright:
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licence:
Authors are free to:
1. Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
2. Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the authors follow the license terms, which include the following:
1. Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
2. ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
3. No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
