Development of the HOTS Test to Measure Students' Critical Thinking Skills on Optical Instrument Materials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i3.11829Keywords:
critical thinking skills, higher-order thinking skills test, optical instrumentsAbstract
The objective of the study was to: 1) develop and produce a HOTS test that is valid and reliable; 2) examine the quality of the items; and 3) measure the critical thinking skills of high school students on the optical instruments material based on the HOTS test developed. Employing Research and Development (R & D) method, this study combined two approach models, namely the Wilson Model and the modified Oriondo and Antonio Model (2014) and the Successive Approximation Model (SAM) by Michael Allen and Richard Sites (2019). This study involved 37 students selected by purposive sampling as test subjects. The results of the study show that: 1) HOTS tests that were valid and reliable, where there were 31 valid questions out of the 60 items tested with a product-moment correlation coefficient of 0.72/high and a test reliability coefficient of 0.79/high; 2) the level of difficulty index of the items is in the range of 0.03-0.92, where 12 items with low discriminating power that need to be revised, while 16 items with very low discriminating power need to be replaced and the effectiveness of the distractor show that there were 13 items with options that need to be replaced; and 3) trials conducted on the HOTS test developed revealed students’ critical thinking skills level, namely 16% low, 65% moderate, and 19% high. Therefore, it can be concluded that the use of the HOTS test is appropriate to measure students’ critical thinking skills.References
Abidin, A. Z., Istiyono, E., Fadilah, N., & Dwandaru, W. S. B. (2019). A computerized adaptive test for measuring the physics critical thinking skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research In Education. 8(3), 376-383. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3.19642
Ali, C. A., Acquah, S., & Esia-Donkoh, K. (2021). A comparative study of SAM and ADDIE models in simulating STEM instruction. African Educational Research Journal, 9(4), 852–859. https://doi.org/10.30918/aerj.94.21.125
Arifin, Z. (2013). Evaluasi pembelajaran. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Arikunto, S. (2012). Prosedur penelitian. Rineka Cipta.
Asiah, N. (2021). The effect of guided inquiry learning models on students’ critical thinking skills and learning outcomes in science subjects at MTs Miftahul Muin. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2), 165-177. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v9i2.5141
Damayanti, A. E., & Kuswanto, H. (2020). The use of android-assisted comics to enhance students’ critical thinking skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440, 1-7. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012039
Istiyono, E., Mardapi, D., & Suparno, S. (2014). Pengembangan tes kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi fisika (PysTHOTS) peserta didik SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i1.2120
Kahar, M. S., Syahputra, R., Arsyad, R. B., Nursetiawan, N., & Mujiarto, M. (2021). Design of student worksheets oriented to higher order thinking skills (HOTS) in physics learning. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 96, 14-29.
Khaeruddin, K., Indarwati, S., Sukmawati, S., Hasriana, H., & Afifah, F. (2023). An analysis of students’ higher order thinking skills through the project-based learning model on science subject. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 19(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v19i1.34259
Lespita, E., Purwanto, A., & Syarkowi, A. (2023). Application of problem based learning model assisted by augmented reality media to improve students’ high order thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i1.9069
Litna, K. O., Mertasari, N. M. S., & Sudirtha, G. (2021). Pengembangan instrumen tes higher order thinking skills (HOTS) matematika SMA kelas X. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia, 11(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpepi.v11i1.278
Magdalena, I., Fauziah, S. N., Faziah, S. N., & Nupus, F. S. (2021). Analisis validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesulitan, dan daya beda butir soal ujian akhir semester tema 7 kelas III SDN Karet 1 Sepatan. Bintang : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sains, 3(2), 198–214.
Marnah, Y., Suharno., & Sukarmin. (2021). Development of physics module based high order thinking skill (HOTS) to improve student's critical thinking. Journal of Physics, 2165, 1-6. doi 10.1088/1742-6596/2165/1/012018
Nisa, S. K., & Wasis. (2018). Analisis dan pengembangan soal high order thinking skills (HOTS) mata pelajaran fisika tingkat Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA). Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.26740/ipf.v7n2.p%25p
Nurilma, F. R., Supriana, E., & Diantoro, M. (2023). Using STEM-Based 3D-multimedia to improve students’ critical thinking skills in uniform circular motion. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(2), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i2.10785
OECD. (2019). Pendidikan di Indonesia belajar dari hasil PISA 2018. Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang Kemendikbud
Quaigrain, K., & Arhin, A. K. (2017. Using reliability and item analysis to evaluate a teacher-developed test in educational measurement and evaluation. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1301013
Redhana, I. W. (2019). Mengembangkan keterampilan abad ke-21 dalam pembelajaran kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1), 2239-2253. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v13i1.17824
Saepuzaman, D., Istiyono, E., Haryanto. (2022). Characteristics of fundamental physics higher-order thinking skills test using item response theory analysis. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(4), 269-279. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.04.28
Saputro, B., Supahar. (2018). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi untuk mengukur pencapaian hasil belajar fisika peserta didik SMA kelas XI materi optika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 1–6.
Setiyoningtyas, R., & Kasmui. (2020). Pengembangan quizizz-assisted test berbasis literasi peserta didik pada materi larutan elektrolit nonelektrolit. Chemistry in Education, 9(2), 63–69.
Shaheen, N. (2016). International students’ critical thinking–related problem areas: UK university teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Research in International Education, 15(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240916635895
Sidik, Y., Ishartono, N., Desstya, A., Prayitno, H. J., Anif, S., Hidayat, M. L. (2021). Improving elementary school students’ critical thinking skill in science through hots-based science questions: A quasi-experimental study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 378-386. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i3.30891
Simamora, H., Hartono., & Effendi. (2021). Analisis kualitas butir soal buatan guru kimia pada tes ujian tengah semester ganjil kelas XII MIPA. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 9(1), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v9i1.3701
Sudjana. (2005). Metode statistika. Tarsito
Sukmagati, P. O., Yulianti, D., & Sugianto. (2020). Pengembangan lembar kerja siswa (LKS) berbasis STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa SMP. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 9(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v9i1.38277
Widjanarko, P. B. (2022). Penerapan pembelajaran dan penilaian berorientasi higher order thinking skill (HOTS) dalam pelajaran fisika dengan pokok bahasan besaran dan satuan di SMA Charitas Jakarta. Science : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 2(3), 405–414. https://doi.org/10.51878/science.v2i3.1590
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright:
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licence:
Authors are free to:
1. Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
2. Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the authors follow the license terms, which include the following:
1. Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
2. ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
3. No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
