Efforts in Increasing Physics Learning Outcomes: Comparing Two Different Methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v10i2.7661Keywords:
learning methods, physics learning outcomes, probing prompting, problem-solvingAbstract
The teaching method used by the teacher is closely related to the results obtained by students during learning. This study aims to analyze whether there are differences in students' learning outcomes of physics taught by problem-solving and probing prompting methods and which method is more effective in improving physics learning outcomes. This type of research is experimental, with a post-test only control group design. The population in this study were all students of class X MAN 2 Model Makassar, which consisted of six classes with a total of 252 students, while the sample was taken using a random class technique. Class X MIA 2 and class X MIA 3 were selected as samples, with a total of 42 students in each class. The results showed that in the cognitive domain, the physics learning outcomes average score of students who were taught using the problem-solving method was 77.08; meanwhile, that of the students taught by the probing prompting method was 81.00. In the psychomotor domain, the learning outcomes average score obtained by the class taught by problem-solving method and probing prompting method were almost equal, that was 98.32 and 98.28, respectively. Finally, in the affective domain, the students’ learning outcomes after using the problem-solving method was 84.20, and that after using the probing prompting method was 83.90. Therefore, it can be concluded that there are differences in physics learning outcomes between students who are taught using problem-solving and probing prompting methods. The probing prompting method is more effective in increasing students’ learning outcomes in the cognitive domain, while the problem-solving method is more effective in developing students’ psychomotor and affective domains.
References
Bancong, H., & Putra, D. (2015). Analisis proses keterampilan proses sains mahasiswa berdasarkan gaya berpikir dan kecerdasan jamak pada praktikum fisika modern di Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 3(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v3i1.248
Dominikus, W. S., Nenohai, J. M. H., & Hale, M. (2020). Increasing students’ mathematical communication skills by applying probing-prompting learning model based on Belu culture artefact. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012020
Emda, A. (2018). Kedudukan motivasi belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran. Lantanida Journal, 5(2), 172. https://doi.org/10.22373/lj.v5i2.2838
Hadi, S., & Radiyatul, R. (2014). Metode pemecahan masalah menurut polya untuk mengembangkan kemampuan siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematis di sekolah menengah pertama. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v2i1.603
Hathcock, S. J., Dickerson, D. L., Eckhoff, A., & Katsioloudis, P. (2015). Scaffolding for creative product possibilities in a design-based STEM activity. Research in Science Education, 45(5), 727–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9437-7
Ismatulloh, K., Hr, B. M., & Lutfi, S. (2020). Application of probing prompting method in physics course. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1539(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1539/1/012062
Kadir, H. D., Arsyad, M., & Marisda, D. H. (2020). Implementation of problem solving methods in elasticity coursee. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(3), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v8i3.3803
Kahar, M. S., Wekke, I. S., & Layn, M. R. (2018). Development of problem solving-oriented worksheet of physics learning in senior high school. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 7(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v7i2.2802
Kodi, O. N. (2021). The probing-prompting method to overcome the monotonous learning process in class. SocioEdu : Sociological Education. 2(2), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.12345/socioedu.v2i2.491
Marisda, D. H. (2016). Pengembangan modul fisika kesehatan materi getaran, gelombang, dan bunyi melalui model pembelajaran langsung di smk kesehatan terpadu Mega Rezky Makassar. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 4(3), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v4i3.325
Marisda, D. H., Handayani, Y., & Rahmawati. (2020). The combination of interactive conceptual learning models and multimedia interactive to minimize misconceptions on the science content. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1572(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1572/1/012069
Muchlis, F., Sulisworo, D., & Toifur, M. (2018). Pengembangan alat peraga fisika berbasis internet of things untuk praktikum hukum newton II. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v6i1.956
Mustofa, M. H., & Rusdiana, D. (2016). Profil kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa pada pembelajaran gerak lurus [Profile of students’ problem solving abilities in straight motion learning]. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.02203.
Nasar, A., & Kurniati, K. (2020). Comparing students’ learning outcomes using problem based learning model and inquiry based learning model. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v8i1.2127
Oktaviyanti, D. T., Wardani, S., & Kurniawan, C. (2018). Improving conceptual understanding of eleventh grade students on colloid topic using multimedia-assisted probing-prompting. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 7(2), 145–149. https://doi.org/10.15294/JISE.V7I2.24062
Prihatiningtyas, S., & Sholihah, F. N. (2020). Project based learning e-module to teach straight-motion material for prospective physics teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(3), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v8i3.3442
Putri, A.V., Effendi, E., & Hadeli L, M. (2016). Peningkatan hasil belajar siswa dengan menerapkan teknik probing-prompting pada mata pelajaran kimia di kelas x sma ysp pusri palembang. (Doctoral dissertation, Sriwijaya University).
Said, M. A., Arsyad, M., & Tawil, M. (2021). The development of electronic practicum modules at elektronic course for physics education program. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.07201
Setiawati, G. A. M. I., Wibawa, I. M. C., & Japa, I. G. N. (2019). Pengaruh model pembelajaran probing prompting berbantuan media video terhadap hasil belajar IPA. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2(3), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v2i3.19512
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Syiami, N. F. (2015). Penggunaan metode probing-prompting untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berbicara siswa. (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia).
Tampubolon, T., & Sitindaon, S. F. (2013). Pengaruh model pembelajaran problem solving terhadap hasil belajar siswa kelas x SMA Negeri 7 Medan. (INPAFI:Inovasi Pembelajaran Fisika), 1(3), 260–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24114/inpafi.v1i3.1915
Udin, T., & Hikmah, N. (2014). Pengaruh penerapan metode problem solving terhadap hasil belajar siswa mata pelajaran matematika pokok bahasan pecahan pada siswa kelas IV SD Negeri Legok 1 Kabupaten Indramayu. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v1i
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright:
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licence:
Authors are free to:
1. Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
2. Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the authors follow the license terms, which include the following:
1. Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
2. ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
3. No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
