STUDENTS’ AFFECTIVE REACTION TOWARD USING G-SUITE MEET FOR EDUCATION IN LEARNING ENGLISH SPEAKING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v11i2.9357Abstrak
This qualitative descriptive study aims to expose the students’ affective reactions after learning speaking through G-Suite Meet as one of G-suite for education features. This also confirms do affective reactions support the enhancement of students’ speaking performance and can this featured be maintained in the future? The respondents of this study were twenty students of SMA Negeri 3 Palu and three of them were as informants. They are chosen as the subject of this study because their English speaking class is conducted in Google meet. In collecting the data, 13 points of questionnaires in term of likert scale and four interview questions in term of semi- structured had been distributed. The responses of the students were displayed using frequency and percentage on the table and then it was described, interpreted and concluded. The information of the interviewees was limited to describe the scope of this study. The results of this study convey that the students expose positive reactions related to the use of G-suite features in term of Google meet to bridge learning speaking. The positive reactions also support the enhancement of students’ speaking performance. However, this study showed a phenomenon that some students do not show significant enhancement related to their performance. In addition, this study also informs that although students confirm positive reaction and the students also show improvement related to their speaking performance, learning speaking through Google meet cannot be regularly maintained, it only stands for urgent situation because conducting learning through Google meet are claimed not optimal.Referensi
Adijaya, N., & Santosa, L.P. Persepsi Mahasiswa Dalam Pembelajaran Online. Wanastra, 10 (2), 550
Arnold, J. (2011). Attention to Affect in Language Learning. Anglistic: International Journal of English studies, 22(1), pp 11-22
Arnold, J. (2009). AFFECT IN L2 LEARNING AND TEACHING. ELIA : Estudious de Linguistica Inglesa Aplicada, pp 145-151
Brown. H.D. (2000). Principle of Language Learning and Teaching: Fourth Edition. New York: Pearson Education Company.
Boyle, A., Maguire, S., Martini, A., Milsom, C, Turner, A., & Conchie,S. (2007). Fieldwork is Good: the Student perception and the Affective Domain. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Vol 31(2), 299-317. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group
Chiablaem, P. (2021). Enhancing English Communication Skills of Thai University Students through Google Apps for Education (GAFE) in a Digital Era during Covid-19 Pandemic. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(3), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9i3.3921
Constantinou, E. K. (2018). TEACHING IN CLOUDS: USING THE G SUITE FOR EDUCATION FOR THE DELIVERY OF TWO ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES COURSES. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 305. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1802305C
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches: Fifth Edition. California: SAGE Publication, Inc
Emran, A.M & Malik, S.I. (2016). The Impact of Google Apps at Work: Higher Education Perspective. iJIM, Vol.10 (4). https://doi.org/103991/ijim.v10i4.6181
Fakhruddin, A. (2019). Using google meet in teaching speaking. Journal of English Language Learning, 2(2), 43–46.
Halimatusyadiyah, N. (2022). ENGAGING STUDENTS SPEAKING SKILL USING GOOGLE MEET PLATFORM: STUDENTS PERCEPTION. JEEP: JOURNAL OF ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM, 9(1), 8.
Van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., Srogi, L., Husman, J., Semken, S., & Fuhrman, M. (2011). Engaging Students to Learn Through the Affective Domain: A new Framework for Teaching in the Geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 59(2), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3543934a
Legowo, B.,Kusharjanta,B., Sutomo,A.D., Mulyadi., & Wahyuningsih, D.(2019). Increasing Competency 4C using The G-Suite Application for Education. International Journal Of Active Learning: IJAL, 4(2)
Nehe, B. M. (2021). Students' Perception on Google Meet Video Confrencing platform during English Speaking class in pandemic era. English Review: Journal of English Education 10(1), pp. 93-104. doi:https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v10il.5359
Nilayon, N., & Brahmakasikara, L. (2018). Using Social Network Sites for Language Learning and Video Conferencing Technology to Improve English Speaking Skills: A Case Study of Thai Undergraduate Students. 11(1), 17.
Sari, I. D. P., & Rahmah, T. H. (2019). Virtual Discussion for EFL Students Establishing Three Domains: Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i3.1586
Subandi, N. Y., Widodo, J. P., & Yappi, S. N. (2022). The Effectiveness of G-Suite Docs on the Students’ Writing Skills at SMA Negeri 1 Batuan. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal). https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i1.4269
Tuan, N. H., & Mai, T. N. (2015). FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING PERFORMANCE AT LE THANH HIEN HIGH SCHOOL. 3(2), 16.
Van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., Srogi, L., Husman, J., Semken, S., & Fuhrman, M. (2011). Engaging Students to Learn Through the Affective Domain: A new Framework for Teaching in the Geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 59(2), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3543934a
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
