USING INCIDENTAL VOCABULARY ACQUISITION TO ENRICH THE STUDENTS VOCABULARY MASTERY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v4i1.919Abstrak
The research aimed to find out the improvement the students’vocabulary in terms of improving their understanding about of nouns and adjectives. To explain the increase, the researcher used a classroom action research (CAR) which was conducted in two cycles in which each cycle consisted of four meetings.The subject was the students at the eight grade of SMP Askari Pallangga Gowa. The number of samples consisted of 37 students. The research findings indicated that using Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition could improve the students’ vocabulary of noun and adjective.It was proved by the result of the diagnostic test, the students’ mean score got was 53.78. After applying the Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition in cycle I, the students’ achievement increased to be 63.6. In cycle II the students’ vocabulary increased to be 85.
Referensi
Allen, Edward David Rebecca M. Vallate. 1977. Classroom Techniques as a second language. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
Beck, Mckeown and McCaslin. 1983. Vocabulary Acquisition 1st Edition. George Allen and Unwin (Publisher) ltd.
Beck, Mckeown and McCaslin. 1983. Vocabulary Acquisition 1st Edition. George Allen and Unwin (Publisher) ltd.
Best, John W. (1981). Research in Education. Third Edition. New York: of America: Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood cliffs, New Jersey.
Coady, J.M (1993). Research on ESL/EFL. Vocabulary Acquisition:Parting it in context. In T. Huckin,M. Hybes,& J.M Coady Second Language Reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 3-23).
Coudy, J.M. (1986). Vocabulary Acquisition: Mystery and Paradox, CA International TESCA.
Davies, E., and Whitney, N. 1984. Study for Skills. Students Book. London: Butter and Tanner.
Gay, LR. 1981. Educational Research: Competencies for analysis and Application. New York: Second Edition. Colombus: Charles E Merrill Publishing Company.
Gairs, Ruth and Redman, Stuart. 1986. Working with Words. A Guide to Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. New York; Cambridge University Press
Good, Carter Victors. 1959. The Dictionary of Education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Harmer, Jeremy. 1991. The principle of English Language Teaching. New York: Longman.
Harmer, Jeremy. 1991. The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman Group. Hackin and Coady (1999). Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition. From http;//www.teachingvocabulary html.
Hornby, A.S. et.al. 2000. The Advances Learner’s Dictionary to Current English. Second Edition. London: Oxford University Press.
Kagan, Spencer. 1994. Cooperative Learning. Kagan. San Clemente,CA: Kagan Publishing
Kustaryo, S. 1988. Reading Method for Colleague Students. Jakarta: Proyek Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan, Direktorat
Krashen (1989). We Aquaire Vocabularyand Spelling by Reading Additional Endence for the Imput Hypotesis : The Modern Language Journal, 73 (4), 439-464.
Mikulecky, B. S. and L. Jeffries. 1986. Reading Power. Boston: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
Nation Paul. 2005. Teaching Vocabulary. http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/September_05_pn.php.
Nusakasuma, T., and Suyanto, K. 1996. Vocabulary and Structure. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Nuttal, Christian. 1988. Teaching Reading Skill in a Foreign Language. London: Heineman Educational. Books Ltd.
Page, Terry & Thomas, JB. 1973. International Dictionary of Education. New York: Nicholas Publisher Co.
Reece, Ian and Walker, Stephen. 1997. Teaching, Training and Learning, A Practical Guide. Third Edition. Great Britain: Business Education Publishers.
Richards, J and Renandya, W. 2002. Methodology in Language Teaching, An Anthology of Current Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. 2000. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. 2000. Series Editors Preface A Way with Words Resource Pack 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, Jack. Platt, John & Weber, Heidi. 1985. Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. England: Longman Group Ltd.
Rivers, W. 1971. Linguistic and Psychological Factors in Speech Perception and Their Implications for Teaching Materials: In Language in
Education. Theory and Practice 20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11-2.
Schail, William. 1967. Seven Days to Faster Reading. New York: Paper Back Library.
Ur. Penny. 1996. A Course in Language Teaching, Practice and Theory. London: Cambridge University Press.
Wallace, Michael J. 1989. Teaching Vocabulary ELBS. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
Webster, Noah. 1983. Webster Twenty Century of English Language. New York: Simon and Sthucher.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
