MOOD UNDERSTAND RECALL DIGEST EXPAND AND REVIEW STRATEGY FOR STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v6i1.1061Abstrak
This research aimed to explain the improvement of the students’ reading comprehension in terms of literal comprehension dealing with main ideas and sequence details and interpretive comprehension dealing with prediction outcomes and conclusion. To explain the improvement, the researcher used a classroom action research (CAR) which was conducted in two cycles in which every cycle consisted of four meetings. The location of this research was taken at the ninth grade students of SMP Muhammadiyah 5 Mariso, Makassar with a number of the subject were 36 students. The research findings indicated that the implementation of Mood Understand Recall Digest Expand and Review (MURDER) Strategy was improved the students’ reading comprehension in terms of literal comprehension and interpretive comprehension. It was proved by the mean score of cycle I was 64.31. It was classified as fair then improved to be 71.20. It was classified as fairly good in cycle II. They are higher than the mean score of diagnostic test 52.21 that classified as poor. Therefore there was improvement of the students’ reading comprehension in terms of literal comprehension dealing with main ideas and sequence of details and interpretive comprehension dealing with prediction of outcomes and conclusion.
Referensi
Abbott, Gerry, Greenwood, John, Mckeating Douglas: Wingard Peter 1981, The Teaching of English as an International Language: A Practice Guide. Great Britain Biddels Ltd.
Alexander, A. 1998 Teaching Reading (www. Nclrc. Org/reading/reindex). Retrieved on October 20, 2009.
Allington and Cunningham. 1996. Sustained Silent Reading program. Available on the internet. http://www.yahoo.com.
Arikunto, S., Suhardjono., Supardi. 2009. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Bumi Aksara: Bandung
Baker, L., & Brown, A.L (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds), Handbook of reading the research. New York: Longman.
Bower, G.H., & Reitman, J.S. (1972). Mnemonic elaboration in multi-list learning. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 11, 478-485.
Cranken. M. C. 1971. Evaluating Sustained Silent Reading in Reading Class. Hongkong,China: http//itselj.org/articles/chow.SSR, HTML.
Carillo. (1976: 1) Teaching Reading London. London: Second Edition USA: Addition Prentice.
Dansereau, D.F (1978). The development of a learning strategy curriculum. In H.D.O’Neill, Jr. (Ed), Learning Strategies. New York: Academic Press.
Frey, Edward (1981) “Teaching Faster Reading” A manual Cambridge. Cambridge: University Press.
Flavel, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A new area of psychological inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
Gloria Simanjuntak, Edithia, Dra. Developing Reading Skill for EFL Students. Jakarta: .Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Gagne, R. M., & Dick, W. (1962). Learning measures in a self-instructional program in solving equations. Psychological Reports, 10, 131-146.
Harris, J. Albert, at al. 1980. How to Increase Reading Ability. New York: Harper Collins publisher.
Herman Anderson, Pearson, and Naggy. 1987. Sustained Silent Reading. Available on the internet. http://www.yahoo.com.
Holt. 1996. Basic dictionary. New York: Rhinest and Winston. Inc
Hornby, A. S. 1994. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. Fourth Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hunt, L.C. 1970. Musselman High school Sustained Silent Reading program: HTTP: // calprointeractive. blogspot. Com /2005/01/ online-resources-related-to-sustained. HTML.
Jim Trelease. Sustained Silent Reading program. Available on the internet. http://www.yahoo.com
Mrs. D.Dowling central. 2001. Musselman High School Sustained Silent Reading Program. Available on the internet. http://www.yahoo.com.
Muhammad Arif. 2006. The Effectiveness of using. K-W-L (Know-Want-Learn) Strategy in Improving Reading Comprehension Ability of the Third Year Students of SMA Karya Bulukumba. Thesis Makassar: UIN Makassar.
Mustamin, Nurhuda. 2005. Teaching Reading Comprehension by using English Magazine Articles at the first years' students of Madrasah Aliyah Muhammadiyah Jauhpandang WAJO. Thesis. Unismuh Makassar
Newell, A., & Simon, H.A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Nuttal, Christine, 1982. Teaching Reading Techniques in a Foreign Language. London: Heinemann Education Books. The organization, and practice. Massachusetts: Newbury House Publisher, Inc.
P, Mayor. 2005 Teaching Reading. London. Third Edition. The USA
Sangkala, I. (2014). Wondershare Quiz Creator Software Improves Students’ Reading Comprehension. JKIP, 1(2), 93-101.
Smith, at al. 1980. Reading Instruction for today children. U.S: Prentice Hall. Inc.
Sternberg, R.J. (1977), Intelligence, Information Processing and Analogical Reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sternberg, R.J., Ketron, J.L., & Powell, J.S. (1982). Componential approaches to the training of intelligent performance. In D.K. Detterman & R.J Sternberg (Eds), How and how much can intelligence be increased. Norwood, NJ: ABLEX.
Tulving, E., & Psotka, J. (1971). Retroactive Inhibition in free recall: Inaccessibility of information available in the memory store. Journal of experimental psychology, 87, 1-8.
The National Center For Education Statistics. 1997. Musselman High School Sustained Silent Reading program. Available on the internet. http://www.yahoo.com.
Wiesendanger and Bader. 1989. Evaluating Sustained Silent Reading in Reading Classes. Hongkong. China : // itslj. Org / articles / chow-SSR. HTML.
Woriyodijoyo. (1989) “ Membaca : Strategy pengantar dan tehniknya “ Jakarta : Depdikbud.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
