DEMOCRATIC AND AUTOCRATIC STRATEGIES: TEACHING ENGLISH AT NURSING CLASS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v8i2.2778Keywords:
Democratic Strategies, Autocratic Strategies, Nursing ClassAbstract
Teaching English for Specific Purposes (ESP) is familiar one in the field of English Language Teaching (ELT). Unfortunately, in practice, many teachers still teach English using the same methods for different departments. Hence, this study aims to look into teachers’ strategies in teaching English at Nursing Class and students’ responds through those teaching strategies. Data were collected from two teachers and 30 students of SMK Yapika Makassar (private vocational school in Makassar, South Sulawesi). To analyse, teachers’ strategies and student’s responds were classified into observation, questionnaire, and interviews. There were two strategies that applied in this study namely democratic (group discussion, student presentation) and autocratic strategies (lecture method and multimedia method). Finding presents frequency of group discussion dominant used by teachers than other strategies. Besides, it related to student’s responds through teaching strategies. Therefore, students prefer democratic strategies than autocratic strategies.References
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C & Razavieh, A. 2010.Introduction to Study in Education (8thed.). Canada: Nelson Education Ltd.
Bracaj, Morena. 2014. Teaching English for Specific Purposes and Teacher Training. European Scientific Journal, Vol. 10, No. 2
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A., (1987). English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Inayah, Nurul. 2012. EFL Teachers' Teaching Strategies in Public Vocational High Schools in Singaraja. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Ganesha. https://www.neliti.com/id/publications/206908/efl-teachers-teaching-strategies-in-public-vocational-high-schools-in-singaraja.
Khoirunnisa, Suparno, and Supriyasi, Slamet. ESP Teacher’s and Students’ Perceptions on Teaching Speaking for a Tourism. Program. Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia. Dinamika Ilmu Vol. 18 No. 1, 2018
Munby, J. (1981). Communicative Syllabus Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nurhayati, Siwi. 2014. Teacher’s Perception on The Student Needs in Learning English and Its Impact to the Teaching Strategies at Pastry Student of SMKN 2 Trenggalek. Unpublished. Tulungagung: IAIN Tulungagung.
Robinson, P. (1991). ESP Today: A Practitioner’s Guide. London: Prentice Halls.
Schippers, U., & Patriana, D. M. (1994). Pendidikan Kejuruan di Indonesia. Bandung: Angkasa.
Sharma, Anuradha. 2015. Autocratic and Democratic Teaching Strategy: Pros and Cons. Indian Journal of Adult Education. Vol. 76 (1)
Yalden, J. (1987). The Communicative Syllabus: Evolution, Design, and Implementation. London: Prentice Halls.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
