THE STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN UNDERSTANDING PRAGMATICS MEANING OF WRITTEN UTTERANCES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v1i2.778Abstract
This research was attempted to find out the achievement of the sixth-semester students of English Department of Muhammadiyah University of Makassar especially Academic Year 2008 in understanding pragmatics meaning of the written utterances. This study employed a Descriptive research method. The sample of this study consisted of 40 students of the Sixth Semester Students of English Department Muhammadiyah University of Makassar which was selected by using simple random sampling. The instrument of the study was an objective test in the form of the checklist and identifying the locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary acts of written utterances which consisted of 35 items. The test was administered to know the students’ achievement in understanding the pragmatic meaning of written utterances. The data obtained from the test was analyzed quantitatively. The mean score obtained from the test was 5, 87 for the locutionary act, 6, 12 for the illocutionary act, and 6, 09 for the perlocutionary act. The data showed that the students’ achievement in understanding the pragmatics meaning of written utterances especially the three layers of speech acts was fair.
Key Words: Pragmatics, locutionary act, illocutionary act, perlocutionary act.
References
Atchison. 1995. Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Cahyono, B. Y. 1995. Kristal-Kristal Ilmu Bahasa. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.
Cook, Guy. 1990. Discourse. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Djajasudarma, T. Fatimah. 1993. Semantik 1: Pengantar Kearah Ilmu Makna. Bandung: Rafika Aditama.
Kadmon, N. 2001. Formal Pragmatics. Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, and Focus. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Kempson. 1975. A Pragmatic Analysis. _. p138.
Levinson, Steven C. 1983. Principles of Pragmatic. London: Longman
Mey, J.L. 2001. Pragmatics. An Introduction. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publisher Inc.
Parera, J. D. 1990. Teori Semantik. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Rahman, A. Qashas. 2006. Turn-Taking Mechanisms and Pragmatics in English Conversations. Makassar: UNM Publishers.
Richards, Platt, & Weber. 1985. Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. Hong Kong: Longman Group Ltd.
Searle, J. R. 1981. Speech Acts. London: Cambridge University Press.
Stalnaker, R. 1972. The Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht, Reidel.
Trosborg, A. 1995. Interlanguage Pragmatics. The request, Complaints, and Apologies. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Verschueren, J. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold
Wierzbicka, A. 1991. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wijana, I Dewa Putu. 1996. Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
