NOMINAL AND VERBAL SENTENCE OF SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE ERRORS IN STUDENTS’ DESCRIPTIVE WRITING ABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v11i2.6945Keywords:
Nominal Sentence, Verbal Sentence, Error, Descriptive writingAbstract
This study investigated Nominal and Verbal Sentence of Simple Present Tense Errors in Students’ Descriptive Writing Ability in Universitas Catur Insan Cendekia, Cirebon. This study used Descriptive Qualitative as Method. The writer chose the texts to analyze the data, interpret data, and conclude the result of study from Students’ Descriptive Writing. The findings showed that the total errors in Nominal Sentence is 94, and Misformation is the most used error consisting of 52 errors or 55,31%. Moreover, the total errors in Verbal Sentence is 162, and Misformation is the most frequency consisting of 90 errors or 55,55%. Those errors are affected by lacking knowledge of grammar, especially to form nominal and verbal sentences.
References
Bluman, Allan G. (2007) Elementary Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cohen & Manion. (2018). Research Method in Education 8th Edition. New York: Routledge.
Fraenkel, R.J. & Wallen, E.N. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: Mc.Graw-Hill.
Fitria, E. (2016). The Correlation Between Students’ Simple Present Tense Mastery and Their Ability in Writing Descriptive Text. A Thesis, Islamic University Raden Intan Lampung. Retrieved from http://repository.radenintan.ac.id/.pdf.
Herring, P. (2016). Complete English Grammar Rules. Farlex International.
Knapp. P & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, Text, Grammar. Australia: University of New South Wales Press Ltd.
Khoiruzzahwa (2020). An Error Analysis of Nominal and Verbal Sentence Mastery in Students’ Writing of Recount Text. A Paper, IAIN Salatiga. Retrieved from http://e-repository.perpus.iainsalatiga.ac.id/.
Mills G.E & Gay L.R (2019). Educational Research Competencies for Analysis Applications, 12th Edition. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Natria, I. (2007). Students’ Error in Using Simple Present Tense in Writing Descriptive Texts. A paper, Semarang State University. Retrieved from http://lib.unnes.ac.id/ 1166/1/2069.pdf.
Obvintseva, N.V. (2016). Verbal Relations in English Grammar. Yekaterinburg, Russia: Ural University.
Renkema. Jan. (2009). Discourse, Of Course. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Ronald, W. (2009). Cognitive Linguistics Research : Langacker.
Seaton, A. & Mew. Y.H. (2007). Basic English Grammar 1. United States: Saddleback Education Publishing.
Shepta, Y.O. (2020). An Analysis of Students’ Errors in Constructing Verbal Sentences in Simple Present Tense in Descriptive Paragraph Writing. A Thesis, Islamic University Raden Intan Lampung. Retrieved from http://repository.radenintan.ac.id/pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
