AN ANALYSIS OF TEACHERS’ QUESTIONING STRATEGIES IN ELT (ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING) THE CLASSROOM INTERACTION AT ELEVENTH GRADE SMA MUHAMMADIYAH 1 UNISMUH MAKASSAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v7i1.1348Keywords:
Teacher question, ELT classroom interaction, Student responsesAbstract
This research deals with teacher questions in senior high school English classroom. The study was conducted to answers three of problem statement. The study was conducted at SMA Muhammadiyah 1 UNISMUH Makassar with the descriptive qualitative method. The study was carried out by observing, interview and taking video recordings of 1 English teacher and 15 students. The researcher takes 2 class in one meeting consist of 90 minutes each class. The result showed that procedural (13%), display (74%) and referential (13%) questions were found in the type of teacher questioning strategies used. However, the reason why teacher used the types of the question is according to the function of the question type. Then the effect of the question to the students based on 6 questions that researcher asked. 60% students agree with the Q1 and 40% disagree. For the Q2 100% students agree with the question that researcher ask and also the Q3 100% students agree with the question. While for Q4 60% students agree and 40% of them disagree. 40% agree and 60% disagree to Q5 and 80% agree and 20% disagree for the Q6.
References
Adibah. 2012. An Analysis of Questions Used by an English Teacher in Classroom. Journal of Airlangga University (online serial), 1(1), 7-12. Accessed on May 6, 2017, from http://journal.unair.ac. id/article _4219 _media_category.html.
Borg. 2006. Introducing Language Teacher Cognition. Centre for Language Education Research, School of Education, University of Leeds (online serial). Accessed on May 20, 2017, from http://www.education.leeds.ac.UK/research/files/145.pdf
Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching by Principle an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. San Francisco: Longman.
C. W. John. 2012. Educational Research. University of Nebraska: PEARSON
Christenbury & Kelly. 1983. Questioning a Part of Critical Thinking (online serial), (40). Accessed on May 20, 2017, from https://eric.ed.gov
Erlinda. R & Dewi.S.R. 2014. Teacher’s Questions in EFL Classroom. STAIN Batusangkar: Ta’dib. Vol.17, No.2 Desember 2014.
Ghafar. 2015. Methodology in Behavioral Research. Malaysia: Penerbit UTM Press Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Kauchak & Eggen. 2014. Introduction to Teaching: Becoming a Professional, 5th edition. University of Utah Paul Eggen. University of North Florida.
Lang, H. 2006. Models, Strategies, and Methods for effective teaching. USA: Pearson.
Lastly Narwasti Ndun. 2015. Teacher Question in the Junior High School English Classroom. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta.
Liu and Zhao Yuqin. 2010. A Study of Teacher Talk in Interaction in English Classes. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (online serial), 33(2), 76-86. Accessed on March 20, 2017 from www.celea. org. can/ teic/90/ 10060806.pdf
Ma. Xioyan. 2008. The Skills of Teacher's Questioning in English Classes. Journal International Education Studies (online serial), Vol.1, No.4, 92-100. Accessed on March 20, 2017, from www.ccesent.org/journal.html
Nunan & Bailey. 2009. Exploring Second Language Classroom Research: a comprehension guide. ELT Research Journal (online serial), 5(3), 234-239. Accessed on March 20, 2017, from http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov. tr/eltrj
Nunan & Lamb. 1996. The Self-directed Teacher: managing the learning process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (online serial). Accessed on May 20, 2017from http://perlinguam.journals.ac.za
Prasetyawati, D. 2015. Analysis of questions used by English teacher At Jakarta intensive learning center (jilc). Makassar: Universitas Negeri Makassar.
Shoomossi. 2004. The effect of Teachers’ Questioning Behavior on EFL Classroom Interaction: A Classroom Research Study.The Reading Matrix (online serial), 4(2), 96-104. Accessed on March 20, 2017 from www.ccesenet.org/journal.html.
Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta Bandung.
Sujariati, Rahman Q & Mahmud. M. 2016. English Teacher’s questioning Strategies in EFL Classroom at SMAN 1 Bontomarannu.Makassar: ELT Worldwide. Vol. 3, No.1 2016.
Widodo, H. 2006. Approaches and Procedures for Teaching Grammar. English Teaching: Practice and Critique. May 2006, Vol.5, No.1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
