Peer Review Process

Each article submitted to the editorial board will be selected through an Initial Review process by the Editorial Board. The article will then be submitted to peer reviewers and further screened through a Double-Blind Preview process. The article will then be returned to the author for revision. This process takes a maximum of one month. Each manuscript will be assessed by peer reviewers based on both substantive and technical aspects. Peer reviewers working with Tenritapu: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Budaya are experts in their fields and related issues. They are experienced in the management and publication of prestigious journals both nationally and internationally.

All submitted manuscripts will be evaluated by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed not to meet the journal's criteria will be rejected without external review. Manuscripts deemed potentially interesting to our readers will be submitted to double-blind reviewers. The editorial board will then make a decision based on the reviewers' recommendations from among several options: reject, require revision, or accept.

The editor reserves the right to decide which manuscripts will be published in the journal. Review Process:

1. Author submits manuscript
2. Editor's Evaluation (some manuscripts are rejected or returned before the review process)
3. Double-Bind Peer Review Process
4. Editor's Decision
5. Confirmation with Author

Publication Frequency

Tenritappu: Jurnal pendidikan, sosial dan budaya Issued 3 (three) times in 1 (one) year. With details of the number 1 (one) in February, on number 2 (two) in Juny and on number 3 (three) in October.