Evaluasi Program Kelompok Usaha Bersama (KUBE) di Kecamatan Batu Kota Batu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/kjap.v6i3.4210Abstract
The implementation of the Joint Business Group (KUBE) program in the Batu City Batu District began in 2015 and is still ongoing today. Until now, there are around 21 active KUBE groups in this sub-district and 21 inactive KUBE groups (the most in Kota Batu). This research then aims to evaluate the KUBE program in the sub-district of Batu, Batu City. This research uses a qualitative model with a descriptive type. Data collection techniques through observation, interviews, and documentation. The subjects were interviewed by the Batu City Social Service, KUBE assistants, and KUBE administrators in Batu District. The results of this study indicate that the KUBE program has not been running according to what is targeted by the Batu City Social Service. The effectiveness criteria are still not fulfilled because KUBE members are not actively producing. Likewise, with the efficiency criteria, KUBE members are still confused in managing funds, and the products that are sold sometimes do not run out. The criteria for the adequacy of the results obtained are not sufficient for daily needs. The criteria for equitable distribution of benefits have been felt, but not for the results. The responsiveness criterion is still lack of mentoring and monitoring and evaluation from the mentor. The criteria for the accuracy of the aid distribution process are good and precise, but not many KUBE has carried out independent graduations.
Keywords: batu city, joint business group (KUBE), policy evaluation, welfare
References
Boone, K., & Roets, G. (2018). Social work, Participation , and Poverty. Journal of Social Work, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017318760789
Chaudry, A., & Wimer, C. (2016). Poverty is Not Just an Indicator : The Relationship Between Income , Poverty , and Child Well-Being. Academic Pediatrics, 16(3), S23–S29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2015.12.010
Dunn, W. (2003). Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik (Edisi 2). Sleman: UGM Press.
Hadi, Krishno, Listiano Asworo, I. T. S. (2020). Journal of Government Civil Society. Journal of Government and Civil Society, 4(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.31000/jgcs.v4i1.2438
Irmawan. (2020). Keberhasilan Kube Mekarsari dalam Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Keluarga. Media Informasi Kesejahteraan Sosial, 44(1), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.31105/mipks.v44i1.1954
Kwasi, A. (2017). Research in Economics Growth , inequality , and poverty reduction in developing countries : Recent global evidence R. Research in Economics, 71, 306–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2016.05.005
Lilian Sarah Hiariey, N. R. R. (2017). Penguatan Kelompok Usaha Bersama (KUBE) Perikanan Tangkap (Studi Kasus Desa Latuhalat, Kota Ambon, Provinsi Maluku). Jurnal Matematika, Saint, Dan Teknologi, 18(2), 120–129.
Marhadi, A. (2017). Profil Elektronik Warung Gotong Royong (E-Warong) KUBE PKH Sebagai Alternatif Penanggulangan Kemiskinan di Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara. ETNOREFLIKA, 6(3), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.33772/etnoreflika.v6i3.487
Muhtar, I. N. (2016). Potensi modal sosial pada kelompok usaha bersama program penanggulangan kemiskinan. Sosio Informa, 2(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.33007/inf.v2i2.254
Nanlohy, B., Mulyana, N., & Darwis, R. S. (2019). Dampak Peran Pendamping Terhadap Pengembangan Usaha dari Kube (Kelompok Usaha Bersama) di Kota Ambon. Jurnal Public Policy, 5(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v5i2.1121
Poerwanti, E. (1998). Dimensi-Dimensi Riset Ilmiah. Malang:UMM Press.
Ras, A. (2013). Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Sebagai Upaya Pengentasan Kemiskinan. Socius, 14, 56-63.
Sabarisman, M. (2012). Perubahan Sosial dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Miskin Perkotaan“Pemberdayaan Melalui KUBE di Kelurahan Sayangsayang Kota Mataram.” Sosiokonsepsia Vol., 17(03), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v17i3.830
Sariningsih, Y. (2017). Entrepreneurial Culture of KUE. Journal Sampurasun, 03(02), 69–81.
Sitepu, A. (2016). Analisis Efektifitas Kelompok Usaha Bersama Sebagai Instrumen Program Penanganan Fakir Miskin. Sosio Informa, 2(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.33007/inf.v2i1.212
Soviati, B. M., Fakhruddin, F., & Ilyas, I. (2017). Pembinaan Anak Rentan Tindak Kriminal melalui KUBE pada Anak Binaan PSMP Antasena Magelang. Journal of Nonformal Education and Community Empowerment, 1(2), 128–136. https://doi.org/10.15294/pls.v1i2.14166
Sutter, C., Bruton, G. D., & Chen, J. (2018). Entrepreneurship as a solution to extreme poverty : A review and future research directions. Journal of Business Venturing, (May), 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.06.003
Widayanti, S. Y. M., & Hidayatulloh, A. N. (2015). Kinerja Kelompok Usaha Bersama (Kube) dalam Pengentasan Kemiskinan Business Group Program Performance on Poverty Elevation. Jurnal PKS, 14(2), 163-180.
Zhou, Y., Guo, L., & Liu, Y. (2019). Land Use Policy Land Consolidation Boosting Poverty Alleviation in China : Theory and Practice. Land Use Policy, 82, 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.024
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
