Implementasi Kebijakan Program Keluarga Harapan (Pkh) Di Kabupaten Enrekang

Authors

  • Fajrin Mahmud
  • Nuryanti Mustari
  • Nasrul haq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26618/kjap.v6i1.3396

Keywords:

, Implementasi, Program Keluarga Harapan

Abstract

 

This study aimed to know the  Implementation Policy of the Family Hope Program;Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) and find out the supporting and inhibiting factors of the Hope Family Program  in Enrekang Regency. This study used descriptive qualitative research, one of the procedures that produced descriptive data in the form of words both in writing and verbally from someone and observed behavior. Data collection techniques were observation, interviews with a number of informants. The results showed that the Implementation policy of the Hope Family Program  in Enrekang District had not been fully implemented optimally in accordance with its objectives, this was seen from the indicators (1) Communication (2) Resources (3) Disposition and ( 4) Bureaucratic structure. Inhibiting and Supporting Factors, which could occur at any stage Implementation of people's understanding was still lacking, the distance of the location of the remote companion so that it was less than optimal and the existence of social jealousy in the community

 

ABSTRAK

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk Mengetahui Implementasi Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) dan mengetahui faktor pendukung dan penghambat Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) di Kabupaten Enrekang. Jenis penelitian yang akan digunakan didalam penelitian ini yaitu jenis penelitian kualitatif yang bersifat deskriptif yakni salah satu prosedur yang akan menghasilkan data deskriptif dalam bentuk kata-kata baik secara tertulis maupun secara lisan dari seseorang serta perilaku yang diamati. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah observasi, wawancara terhadap sejumlah informan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Implementasi Kebijakan Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) di Kabupaten Enrekang belum sepenuhnya terlaksana dengan optimal sesuai dengan tujuannya, hal ini dilihat dari indikator (1) Komunikasi (Communication) (2) Sumber Daya (Resources) (3) Disposisi dan (4) Struktur birokrasi. Faktor Penghambat dan Pendukung, dimana dapat terjadi disetiap tahap Implementasi pemahaman masyarakat yang masih kurang, jarak tempuh lokasi pendamping jauh sehingga kurang maksimal dan adanya kecemburuan sosial di masyarakat.

 

 

References

Arif Rohman.(2009). Memahami Pendidikan dan Ilmu Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Mediatama

Dye, Thomas R, 2005. Understanding Public Policy, Elevent Edition, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall

Dunn, William N., 2003. Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta

Easton. 2001. Implementasi Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Di Desa Maron Kec. Kademangan Kab. Blitar : Jurnal Administrasi Negara FISIP UNESA

Edward III, dan George C. 1980. Implementing Public Policy, Congressional Quarterly Press, Washington.

Korten, David. 2005. Managemen Kinerja ektor Publik: Yogyakarta

Nugroho, Riant. 2006. Kebijakan Publik Formulasi, Implementasi dan Evaluasi. Jakarta:PT.Elek Media Komputindo.

Muhaimin, Suti’ah, dan Sugeng Listyo Prabowo, 2009, Manajemen Pendidikan, Jakarta: ...Kencana, h. 349.

Suharno. 2008. Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) memotong matarantai kemiskinan anak bangsa. Pendidikan Pasca Sarjana Spesialis-1. Pekerja Sosial STKS Bandung

Suratman. 2017. Generasi Implementasi dan Evaluasi Kebijakan Publik. Surabaya: CAPIYA Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-30

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): April 2020

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).