Pengembangan Perangkat Authentic Assessment Dalam Praktikum Fisika Modern Prodi Pendidikan Fisika Unismuh Makassar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v4i1.298Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan (1) untuk mendeskripsikan kualitas perangkat Asesmen otentik Fisika Modern berdasarkan kriteria valid dan reliabilitas dan (2) untuk menganalisis respon mahasiswa dan asisten/dosen pengampu mata kuliah praktikum Fisika Modern terhadap perangkat Asesmen otentik Fisika Modern.Hasil penelitian baik berupa perangkat asesmen otentik, menunjukkan bahwa perangkat yang dikembangkan meliputi instrumen penilaian responsi, kegiatan praktikum, dan laporan hasil praktikum, setelah dilakukan validasi dan uji coba terbatas dengan nilai rata-rata validitas instrumen penilaian responsi sebesar 3,88 (sangat valid) untuk semua topik percobaan, nilai rata-rata validitas instrumen penilaian kegiatan praktikum sebesar 3,80 (sangat valid), dan rata-rata validitas instrumen penilaian laporan hasil praktikum sebesar 3,82 (sangat valid). Sedangkan untuk angket respon mahasiswa dan dosen, setelah dilakukan validasi memperoleh nilai rata-rata sebesar 3,85 (sangat valid). Respon mahasiswa terhadap perangkat asesmen otentik termasuk dalam kategori merespon baik dengan nilai persentase rata-rata sebesar 89,19%. Hasil persentase rata-rata respon dosen terhadap perangkat asesmen otentik adalah 91,67% (merespon baik). Selain itu untuk tingkat reliabilitasnya, setelah dianalisis diperoleh untuk responsi nilai persentage of agreement sebesar 0,92, kegiatan praktikum sebesar 1,00, dan laporan hasil praktikum sebesar 1,00, sehingga ketiga perangkat penilaian tersebut dikatakan reliabel.Sehingga disimpulkan bahwa perangkat asesmen otentik dinyatakan valid dan reliabel. Berdasarkan temuan penelitian ini, maka disarankan kepada dosen fisika yang bertanggunng jawab dalam praktikum Fisika Modern untuk menggunakan perangkat asesmen otentikini dalam upaya meningkatkan kualitas proses dan hasil belajar mahasiswa.
Kata kunci: asesmen otentik
The study aimed at (1) describing the quality of authentic assessment instrument of Modern Physics based on the criteria of valid and reliability and (2) analyzing the students’ response and the lecture’s of Modern Physics Practicum course toward authentic assessment instrument of Modern Physics. The results of the study revealed that the instrument developed was in valid category, included response assessment instrument, practicum activities, and assessment report on practicum; after conducting validation and limited test, the mean score of response assessment instrument validity was 3,88 (very valid) to all the lesson topic, the mean score of practicum activities instrument validity was 3,80 (very valid), and the assessment report on practicum instrument validity was 3,82 (very valid); whereas, the students’ and lecture’s questionnaire after the validation was 3,85 (very valid). The students’ response on authentic assessment was in good response category with the mean percentage 89,19%. The mean percentage of the lecture’s response on authentic assessment instrument was 91,67% (good response). Moreover, in terms of reliability, the result of analyzis indicated that the percentage of agreement of response was 0,92, the practicum activities was 1,00, and the report on practicum was 1,00; thus, the three assessment instruments were confirmed as reliable. The conclusion of the study was the authentic assessment instrument of Modern Physics Practicum was valid and reliable as well as the students and lecture’s response was confirmed as good.
Key words: authentic assessment
References
Aitken, Nola dan Pungur, Lydia. Authentic Assessment. University of Lethbridge: Alberta.2007
Pantiwati, Yuni. Authentic Assessment for Improving Cognitive Skill, CriticalCreative Thinking and Meta-Cognitive Awareness. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.4, No.14, 2013.
Mueller, J. 2006. Authentic Assessment. North Central College. Tersedia: http://jonatan.muller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/whatisist.htm, diaksestanggal 7 Mei 2014.
Frey, Schmitt, & Allen. Defining Authentic Classroom Assessment. Reviewed Electronic Journal, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2012. University of Kansas.
Jennifer, Arianne dan Kathryn. Authentic Assessment In Elearning: Reflective And Collaborative Writing In The Arts. Proceedings Ascilite.Australia: Hobart Tasmania. 2011.
Nurgiyantoro, Burhan.Penilaian Otentik dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press. 2011.
Tawil, Muhammad.Teaching-Learning & Portofolio Assesmen. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya. 2006.
Tawil, Muhammad. Model Pembelajaran Sains Berbasis Portofolio Disertai dengan Asesmen. Makassar: Badan Penerbit UNM. 2011.
Djamarah dan Zain. Strategi Belajar Mengajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. 2005.
Sumaji.PendidikanSains yang Humanistis. Yogyakarta: Kanisius. 2003.
Rusdi, A. 2008. Model Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran. Online. http://anrusmath.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/pengembangan/, diakses 18 Juli 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright:
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licence:
Authors are free to:
1. Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
2. Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as the authors follow the license terms, which include the following:
1. Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
2. ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
3. No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
