Analysis of Misconception through CRI (Certainty of Response Index) Method among Physics Education Students

Authors

  • Siti Hajar Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Hutry Handayani Isra Universitas Khairun Ternate
  • Adeline Silaban Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Muhammad Akbar Universitas Cenderawasih

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i3.11539

Keywords:

certainty of response index, learning physics, misconception, understanding concepts

Abstract

This study aims to determine the level of misconceptions that occur in Cenderawasih University physics education students in the material Temperature, Heat and Waves. This research is a descriptive research conducted in physics department of Cendrawasih University by involving 22 physics education students. The data collection technique used was a test in the form of multiple choice questions of 30 items. The questions were distributed to students and then the results were analyzed by using the Certainty Of Response Index (CRI) method to be categorized into four levels, one of which is misconception category.  The results of the study revealed that students experience misconception in the three materials analyzed with the average percentage of students who experienced misconception in the material of Temperature, Heat, and Waves are 20.7% (low category), and 17,61% (low category), and 32.12% (moderate category), respectively. One of the factors causing misconceptions is the lack of understanding and references from educators. Therefore, it is expected that the physics materials is delivered clearly based on the concept so that students can avoid misconceptions.

References

A’yun, Q., Harjito., & Nuswowati, M. (2018). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa menggunakan tes diagnostic multiple choice Berbantuan CRI (Certainty of Response Index). Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 12(1), 2108–2117. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v12i1.13302

Ali, M. (2019). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa berdasarkan gender dalam pembelajaran fisika dengan menggunakan tes diagnostik two-tier di Kotabaru. Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan., 7(1), 59-66. https://doi.org/10.33659/cip.v7i1.120

Anisfaizurrahmah. (2018). Strategi pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap pemahaman konsep fisika peserta didik SMA Negeri 1 Pakue. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v6i2.1306

Asmin, L. O., & Rosdianti. (2021). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa SMA Negeri 09 Bombana dengan menggunakan CRI pada konsep suhu dan kalor. Konstan: Jurnal Fisika Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.20414/konstan.v6i2.100

Aulia, S., Diana, N., & Yuberti. (2018). analisis miskonsepsi siswa SMP pada materi fisika. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 155-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v1i2.3516

Chen, C. W., Andersson, B., & Zhu, J. (2023). A factor mixture model for item responses and certainty of response indices to identify student knowledge profiles. Journal of Educational Measurement, 60(1), 28-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12344

Entino, R., Hariyono, E., & Lestari N. A. (2022). Analisis miskonsepsi peserta didik sekolah menengah atas pada materi fisika. Pendipa: Journal of Science Education, 6(1), 177-182. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.1.177-182

Febriani, Y., Sundari, C., Handayani, R. D., Asra, Z., Apriniyadi, M. (2022). Analisis miskonsepsi pada konsep gerak lurus menggunakan Certainty Of Response Index (CRI). Jurnal Transformasi (Informasi & Pengembangan Iptek, 18(1), 66-73. https://doi.org/10.56357/jt.v18i1.304

Febrianti, J., Akhsan, H., & Muslim, M. (2019). Analisis miskonsepsi suhu dan kalor pada siswa SMA Negeri 3 Tanjung Raja. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 6(1), 90-102. https://doi.org/10.36706/jipf.v6i1.7819

Gumilar, S. (2016). Analisis miskonsepsi konsep gaya menggunakan Certainty of Respon Index (CRI). Gravity: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 2(1), 59-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/gravity.v2i1.924

Hull, M. M., Jansky, A., & Hopf, M. (2022). Does confidence in a wrong answer imply a misconception?. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.18.020108

Khoiri, H., Wijaya, A. K., & Kusumawati, I. (2017). Identifikasi miskonsepsi buku ajar fisika SMA kelas X pada pokok bahasan kinematika gerak lurus. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisiska (JIPF), 2(2), 60-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v2i2.259

Koto, I., & Gusma, S. E. (2021). Using certainty response index to differentiate lack of knowledge and misconception about basic electrical concepts. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1731, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1731/1/012070

Manalu, A., Panjaitan, M., Naibaho, R. M. (2019). Analisis miskonsepsi mahasiswa program studi PGSD Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar pada materi mekanika dengan menggunakan metode Certainly Of Respons Index(CRI). Jurnal Ilmiah Simantek, 3(2), 78-84.

Nasir, M., Cari., Sunarno, W., & Rahmwati, F. (2021). Article diagnostic difficulties and misconceptions of light refraction: a need analysis learning abstract concepts using PhET simulation. Proceedings of the Internasional Joint Conference on Science and Engineering, 209, 317-322. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.211215.056

Prayuda, A. T. H. (2021). Identifikasi pemahaman konsep dan miskonsepsi peserta didik dengan metode Certainty Of Response Index (CRI) pada materi elastisitas dan hukum hooke kelas XI di SMA Negeri 4 Bantaeng. Skripsi. Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

Resbiantoro, G., Setiani, R., & Dwikoranto. (2022). A review of misconception in physics: The diagnosis, causes, and remediation. The Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2), 403-427. doi 10.36681/tused.2022.128

Robo, F., Palilingan, R. N., & Mondolang, A. H. (2021). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa pada materi fisika di SMA Negeri 8 Halmahera Timur menggunakan Certainty Of Response Index (CRI). Charm Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 2(2), 120-125. https://doi.org/10.53682/charmsains.v2i2.118

Safriana, S., & Fatmi, N. (2018). Analisis miskonsepsi materi mekanika pada mahasiswa calon guru melalui force concept inventory dan certainty of response index. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 6(2), 90-94. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v6i2.11897

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suparno, P. (2013). Miskonsepsi dan perubahan konsep dalam pendidikan fisika. Grasindo.

Surmaini., Syafe’i, I., & Diani, R. (2021). An analysis of students' physics misconceptions in online learning using the four-tier diagnostic test with certainty of response index (CRI). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012099

Trisnawati, E. (2019). Analisis miskonsepsi pada konsep dasar IPA menggunakan Certainty Of Response Index (CRI). Dialektika: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Pendidikan Dasar, 9(2), 210-227. https://doi.org/10.58436/jdpgsd.v9i2.427

Utami, D. N., & Wulandari, H. R. T. (2016). The use of astronomy questions as an instrument to detect student’s misconceptions regarding physics concepts at high school level by using CRI (Certainty of Response Index) as identification methods. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 771, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/771/1/012027

Wahyuni, A. S. A. (2018). Konsepsi dan miskonsepsi siswa, mahasiswa calon guru, dan guru pada topik cahaya dalam pembelajaran fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v6i3.1503

Wiyoko, T., & Hidayat, P. W. (2020). Analisis miskonsepsi mahasiswa PGSD dengan metode Certainty Of Response Index (CRI) melalui fitur quis edmodo. Jurnal Muara Pendidikan, 5(2), 680-688. https://doi.org/10.52060/mp.v5i2.375

Yeberti., Suryani, Y., & Kurniawati. (2020). Misconception through CRI (Certainty of Response Index) method among physics education students. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 245-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v3i2.6061

Yuniarti, E., Bahar, A., & Elvinawati, E. (2020). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa pada materi konsep redoks menggunakan Certainty Of Response Index (CRI) di SMA Negeri 9 Kota Bengkulu. Alotrop: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Kimia, 4(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.33369/atp.v4i1.13714

Downloads

Published

2023-08-19