KOMPARASI ESTETIK SENI GRAFFITI KARYA ALIASTIGA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/jh.v13i1.12160Abstract
This study aims to analyze aesthetic comparisons of graffiti art by Aliastiga from 2006-2022 in Makassar City. The analytical method used in this study is a qualitative descriptive analysis method, supported by the theory of Form Aesthetics from Dr. A.A.M Djelantik and the theory of Functional Aesthetics from Edmund Burke Feldman as a reference for analysis. The results of this study show that the graffiti artwork created by Aliastiga initially originated from an interest in art in the form of a character and writing. The work produced by Aliastiga from early 2006 has shown that artists are very talented and have good skills. Although in reviewing the weight of his work, Aliastiga does not have ideas and messages in his work, Aliastiga emphasizes artistic visuals in his work. Aliastiga graffiti art is not just a hobby, but in it becomes an artistic movement that tends to fight acts of vandalism.References
Alex Alonso. 1998. Urban Graffiti on The City Landscape. San Diego State University Journal.
Arswani Sujud, dalam SuharsimiArikunto2006. Prosedur Penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik
Ardianti Permata Ayu. 2013. Nirmana Komposisi tak Berbentuk. Fakultas Seni Rupa Institut Kesenian Jakarta. Jurnal Ilmiah Widya.
Barry, S. 2008. Jalanan Seni Jalanan Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Studium.
Candra,Cristian Oki. 2013. Pesan Visual Mural Kota Karya Jogja Mural Forum – Yogyakarta [Skripsi]. Yogyakarta (ID): Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Djelantik, A.M.M. 1999. Estetika Sebuah Pengantar. Bandung. Masyarakat Seni Pertunjukan Indonesia
Faisal, Muh. (2018). Identity Contestation of Contemporary Painting Art in Makassar. Journal SCIRJ, 6(6), 15-24.
Faisal, M. (2019). Medan Identitas Seniman Kontemporer. Emik, 2(1), 1-20.
Feldman, Edmun Burke. 1967. Art as Image and Idea. New jersey. Prentice-Hall, Inc
Ferianto, Ghofuur Eka. Street Art: Representasi Identitas Dan Kritik Sosial (Studi Kasus Pada Generasi Baru Street Art Joy O Klan Kota Malang) (Doctoral dissertation, Brawijaya University).
Ganz, N. 2004. Graffiti World: Street art from five continents. New York. HarryN. Abrams
Moch Fawzi. 2016. Analisis Karya Seni Graffiti Sleepy.Jurnal Pendidikan Seni Rupa. 04 (02): 244-252
Mulyadi, Rizki Akbar. 2016. Perancangan Buku Fotografi Street Art antara Tradisi dan Moderenisasi di Kota Yogyakarta,Yogyakarta: Institut Seni Indonesia
Moleong, Lexy J. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. 2015.Metode Penelitian Pendidikan:Pendekatan Kuantitatif,Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung :Alfabeta
Wardah Amilah Yani. 2016. Analisis Garis dan Warna Graffiti Darbotz pada Pameran Monster Inside Us. Jurnal Pendidikan Seni Rupa. 04 (02): 330–335
Irwan Malin Basa. 2016. Analisis Bentuk, Makna dan Fungsi Graffiti Berbahasa–Inggris Pada Angkot Tanah Dasar: Suatu Kajian Sosiolinguistik. Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris FTIK IAIN Batusangkar.
Oka Setsu. 2019. Analisis Seni Street art Setsu di Kota Yogyakarta,Yogyakarta: Institut Seni Indonesia
