A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE ENGLISH TEACHING SKILLS BETWEEN THE CERTIFIED AND NON-CERTIFIED ENGLISH TEACHERS IN BANTAENG REGENCY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v2i2.789Abstract
This study compares the English teaching skills between certified and non-certified English teachers and the endeavors are dominantly done by both in developing the English teaching skills. The causal-comparative design was used to investigate the candidate of Junior and Senior High Schools certified and non-certified English teachers in Bantaeng Regency based on their scores from two standardized instruments. Study result indicated that there was no significant different English teaching skills between certified and non-certified English teachers. In addition, the dominant endeavors done by the certified and non-certified English teachers has revealed that most of certified and non-certified English teachers were active in cognitive stage rather than in practice and evaluation stage. Based on the findings, the researcher deduced that both certified and non-certified English teachers in Bantaeng Regency have no significant difference in the English teaching skills because of both English teachers have similar endeavors in developing their skills.
Keywords: English teaching skills, certified English teachers, non-certified English teachers, endeavors, developing skills
References
Ahmad & Setyaningsih, E. 2012. Teacher Professionalism: A Study on Teachers' Professional and Pedagogic Competence at Junior, Senior, and Vocational High Schools in Banyumas Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. Sosiohumanika, 5(1), 93–106.
Ali, N., et. al. 2013. Keterampilan Dasar Mengajar. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Alma, et al. 2009. Guru Profesional: Menguasai Metode dan Terampil Mengajar. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Azwar, S. 2001. Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bailey, M. K. (2006). Language Teacher Supervision: A Case-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Borich, G. D. 2006. Effective Teaching Methods: Research-Based Practice Sixth Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall
Buku Kerja. 2012. Panduan Penentuan Skoring Kriteria. (Online), (http://www.bukukerja.com/2012/10/panduan_penentuan_skoring_kriteria. html, accessed August, 13th 2014)
Creswell, J. H. 2008. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (3th Ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as A Global Language (2nd Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. 2006. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Grant, W. L., Hindman, L. J., Stronge, J. H. 2013. Planning, Instruction, and Assessment: Effective Teaching Practices. New York: Routledge.
Jalal, F., et al. 2009. Teacher Certification in Indonesia: A Strategy for Teacher Quality Improvement. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. 2004. Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches 2nd ed. United States of America: Pearson Education, Inc.
Kelly, M. 2001. Planning Instruction. (Online), (http://712educators.about.com/od/teachingstrategies/a/planning_task.htm, accessed October, 27th 2013)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
