THE IMPLEMENTATION OF “ARIAS” STRATEGY TO INCREASE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL AT SMA NEGERI 1 BUNGORO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v1i1.764Abstract
The Implementation of “ARIAS” Strategy to Increase Students’ Speaking Skill at SMA Negeri 1 Bungoro. The objective of the research is intended to know the increasing of the students’ accuracy and fluency in speaking through ARIAS strategy at third-year students’ of SMA Negeri 1 Bungoro. The method of this research is classroom action research consist of two cycles. Both of cycles consist of four meetings. It means that there are eight meetings for two cycles. The subject in this research is X.3 Senior High School in 2011-2012 academic years. That consists of 17 women and 35 men. Instruments are speaking test and observation.
Keywords: Speaking, Assurance, Relevance, Interest, Assessment, Accuracy, Fluency and Satisfaction.
Penerapan Strategi "ARIAS" untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Siswa Berbicara di SMA Negeri 1 Bungoro. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah ingin mengetahui peningkatan akurasi siswa dan kefasihan dalam berbicara melalui strategi ARIAS pada siswa tahun ketiga dari SMA Negeri 1 Bungoro. Metode penelitian ini adalah penelitian tindakan kelas terdiri dari dua siklus. Kedua siklus terdiri dari empat pertemuan. Ini berarti bahwa ada delapan pertemuan selama dua siklus. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah X.3 SMA tahun 2011-2012 tahun akademik. Yang terdiri dari 17 perempuan dan 35 laki-laki. Ada 2 intrumen yang digunakan tes berbicara dan observasi.
Kata Kunci: Berbicara, Jaminan, Relevansi, Bunga, Pengkajian, Akurasi, Kefasihan dan Kepuasan.
References
Brazil D, 1992. Classroom and spoken discourse. Birmingham: the University of Birmingham.
Brown, H. D. 1994. The principle of language learning and teaching. Third edition. New Gersey: Prantice Hall Regents.
Byrne, Donn. 1987. Teaching Oral English. Longman Publishing Group.
Coulthard, M. 1985. An introduction to discourse analysis. Second edition. Harlow: Longman.
Dalle, Basri. 2010. Fundamentals of Research Methodology. Makassar: Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar.
Ferre. P. John. 1983. Merill Guide to the Research Paper. States of America: Charles E. Merill Publishing Company.
Goodman, CV. 1973. Dictionary of Education. New York: Mc. Grow Hill, Inc.
Harmer, J. 1987. The Practice of English language teaching. New York: Longman Inc.
Manser Martin, H. 1983. Oxford Learner’s Pocket Dictionary. New Edition. Oxford University Press.
Tiro, Muhammad Arif. 2000. Dasar-Dasar Statistika. Makassar: State University of Makassar Press.
Tiro, Muhammad Arif and Baharuddin Ilyas. 2002. Statistika Terapan untuk Ilmu Ekonomi dan Ilmu Sosial. Makassar: Andira Publisher.
Webster’. University Dictionary. Massachusettss, USA: A & C Merriam Company, Publishers.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
