THE USE OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING TO INCREASE THE STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v10i1.4981Keywords:
Communicative Language Teaching Method, English for Specific Purposes, English learning motivation typesAbstract
This research aimed to improve the students’ motivation by using Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) Method in teaching English at the Third Semester of Dental Nurse Department Poltekkes Kemenkes Makassar. The teaching material was English for Specific Purposes and the subjects of the research consisted of two classes, they were class A as a control class and class B as an experimental class. This research used quasi-experimental design with nonequivalent control group design. The research indicated significant increasing of the students’ English learning motivation by using Communicative Language Teaching method for experimental class than applying Grammar Translation Method in control class. The score of Intrinsic, Integrative and Instrumental motivation, indicated it. The mean scores of students before treatment was 47.05 and after treatment was 81.78 in experimental, while in control class mean scores of students was 51.16 and after treatment was 51.89. The results of the research showed that Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) was effectively improving the students’ English Learning Motivation than using Grammar Translation Method (GTM). The table shows the different students’ mean score for both two Classes. For Experimental class, the students’ mean score improved significantly from 47.05 with standard deviation 7.491 to 81.78 with standard deviation 6.386. For Control class, the mean score of the students increase from 51.16, standard deviation 10.602 to 51.89, standard deviation 10.671.
References
Ahmad Saeed.(2013), Applying Communicative Method in Teaching English as a Foreign Language: a Case Study of Pakistan, Faculty of Education Northeast University.
Brown. H.D.(2004). Principle of Language Learning and Teaching. New York. Addision Wesley Longman. Inc.
Brown. H. Douglas.(2007). Principle of Language Learning and Teaching. New York. Addision Wesley Longman. Inc.
Chang, H.C (2014). “Motivation TVES Nursing Students: Effect of CLT on Leaner Motivation”. Cgang Gung Journal Humanities and Social Science
Dja’far, Cahyono, and Bashtomi.(2016). “EFL Teachers’ Perception of University Students’ Motivation and ESP Learning Achievement”, Journal of Education and Practice ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) Vol.7, No.14, 2016
Dornyei, Zolt’n.(2009). “Motivation in Second and Foreign Language LearningThames Valley University”. Journals Cambridge (http://journals.cambridge.org/ abstract_S026144480001315X. 79-101)
Duta N.(2015). “Importance of the Motivation of Students for Learning-Premise for Academic Performance, Inventory of Reasons for which Students Lear”. Euromentor Journal, Vol.VI, No. 2/June 2015
Gay.L.R, Geoffrey EM, and Peter W.A. (2012), Educational Research; Pearson Education, Inc,
Hidayat.(2009). The Effectiveness of Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) Method to Teach Reading Viewed From Students Motivation (an Experimental Study in the First Year Students of SMK 1 Kota Bima NTB). Thesis. English Education Department Graduate School. Surakarta.Universitas.Sebelas Maret.
Hutchinson T., Waters A (1987) English for Specific Purposes, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne Sydney.
Inga D and Daiva Z,(2013). Language Learner Motivation in ESP, kaunas University of Technology, Lituania
Liuoliene A and Metiuniene R(2006), “Second Language Learning Motivation”, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateities
Passassung, N (2003). “Teaching English in an Acquisition-poor Environment at Ethnogrphies Example of a Remote Indonesian EFL Classroom”, University of Sidney
Rabbini R and Robert D.(2006), “ CLT and motivating leaners to communicate”, In K. Bradford-Watts, C. Ikeguchi, & M. Swanson (Eds.) JALT2005 Conference Proceedings. Tokyo: JALT.
Richards, Jack C and Rodgers, Theodore S. (2003). “Approaces and Methods in Language Teaching”. England. Cambridge University Press.
Sheikh A and M. Nasir.(2014). ”Effect of Different Teaching Styles on Students’ Motivation towards English Language Learning at Secondary Level’; University Punjab Lahore
Sugiyono (2016) MetodePenelitianKuantitatif, Kualitatifdan R & D: CV. Alfabeta Bandung.
Vongxaym and Hongkham (2013) in The implementation of communicative language teaching (CLT) in an English Department in a Lao Higher Educational Institution
Wimolmas R. (2012).”A Survey Study of Motivation in English Language Learning of First Year of Undergraduate Students at Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology (SIIT) Thammasat University,” Thammasat University, Thailand.
Yang, Yingjie I. J.(2014) The Implementation of Speaking Fluency in Communicative Language Teaching: An Observation of Adopting the 4/3/2 Activity in High Schools in China, University of Southern Queensland, Australia
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
