STUDENT'S PERCEPTION TOWARDS THE USE OF EDMODO IN LEARNING EFFECTIVE LISTENING IN THE PANDEMIC COVID-19 PERIOD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v10i1.4940Keywords:
student’s perceptions, Edmodo, Effective Listening, Covid-19Abstract
Virtual class or commonly referred to as online class is one form of learning media that uses the Internet specifically during the quarantine of covid-19. Quantitative descriptive analysis in this study examines the student’s perception of English Literature Study Program Universitas Flores about the use of the Edmodo platform in Effective Listening class at the time of Covid-19 quarantine. The number of samples in this study is 44 students of English Literature Study Program of Universitas Flores who have been taken Effective Listening class during the Covid-19 quarantine period. The result is that Edmodo platform used in Effective Listening class was positive. The average of 98% of English Literature Study Program Students of Flores University agreed to use Edmodo applications as learning media to learn Effective Listening Class at Covid-19 quarantine time since it is user-friendly. This is because Edmodo's interface looks like a Facebook as social media that students have known in their daily lives
References
Agustina, N., & Susanto, R. (2017). Persepsi Guru Terhadap Pengembangan Profesionalisme Melalui Pelatihan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Edmodo. In Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Teknik Informatika (SENAPATI) (No. 7).
Balasubramanian, Kandappan., et al. (2014). A study on “Student preference towards the use of Edmodo as a learning platform to create responsible learning environment”. ELSEVIER Science Direct Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science 144 (2014) 416-422 5th Asia Euro Conference 2014.
Ekayati, R. (2018). Implementasi Metode Blended learning Berbasis Aplikasi Edmodo. Jurnal EduTech Vol. 4 No.2 , 50-56.
Enriquez, M. A. S. (2014). Students ’ Perceptions on the Effectiveness of the Use of Edmodo as a Supplementary Tool for Learning.DLSU Research Congress, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Kayaizmir, Haldun. (2012). Blending technology with constructivism; implications for an ELT classroom. Teaching English with Technology, 15(1), 3-13
Uno, H.B. (2011). Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya: Analisis di Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
