THE IMPACT OF GOOGLE CLASSROOM AND EXTENSION ON STUDENT’S MOTIVATION AND ENGAGEMENT IN EFL CLASSROOM (THE CASE STUDY OF SMA ISLAM ATHIRAH BONE)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v13i2.15307Abstract
In today's technology-driven world, students are increasingly surrounded by digital tools, with easy access to vast amounts of information (Egbert, 2009). From a pedagogical perspective, integrating technology into education is essential for successful learning outcomes (Sebring and Chicago School Consortium, 2013). Despite this, less than half of students utilize technology for academic purposes, though 92% have access to it at home. The evolving information age has made previously expensive technologies accessible to many (Edwards, 2009), necessitating that educators adapt to this technological integration. This study examines the impact of Google Classroom and its extensions on student motivation and engagement in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms at SMA Islam Athirah Bone. The research highlights the importance of incorporating real-world technology into EFL classes to enhance student interest and motivation (Usher & Center on Education, 2012). Technology supports diverse learning styles, fosters community, and provides hands-on experiences, especially beneficial for students with learning disabilities (Heafner, 2004; Liu, 2016). As English is a global language, its learning is critical for accessing research and higher education (Morris & Maxey, 2014). Traditional methods have evolved, with technology playing a pivotal role in English language instruction (Graddol, 2012).This qualitative study uses video recordings, interviews, and observation checklists to explore the impact of technology on student engagement and motivation in EFL classrooms. Data collection involved classroom observations and semi-structured interviews with teachers and students. The findings indicate that both teachers and students at SMA Islam Athirah Bone perceive the use of Google Classroom and its extensions as beneficial for active learning and engagement. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of how technological tools can enhance EFL learning experiences and suggests practical applications for better classroom interactions.
References
Amalia Solikhah, Nur. 2023. “Impact of Technology in Teaching and Learning English as Foreign Language : TESOL Context.” Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature 3 (1): 83–91. https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v3i1.194.
Apuke, Oberiri Destiny. 2017. “Quantitative research methods: A synopsis approach.”Journal Al Manhal 33 (5471): 1–8.
Aslanyan-rad, Erfan. 2024. “Personalized WebQuest-based learning in EFL ’ s students of higher education,” no. August. https://doi.org/10.22034/JELT.2024.15087.1071.
Badejo, Johannes Adedokun, dan Joyram Chakraborty. 2022. “The effects of technology on incarcerated student motivation and engagement in classroom-based learning.” Human-Intelligent Systems Integration 4 (3–4): 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42454-022-00044-8.
Barir Hakim, Abdul. 2016. “Efektivitas Penggunaan ELearning Moodle,Google Classroom Dan Edmodo.” Jurnal I-Statement Vol.02:2. https://doi.org/10.46371/istatement.v2i1.16.
Brown, H Douglas. 2014. Principles of language learning and teaching: A course in second language acquisition. Pearson.
Chang, Hui-chin. 2014. “Motivating TVES Nursing Students : Effects of CLT on Learner Motivation” 1 (April): 75–101.
Ehrlich, Stacy B, Susan E Sporte, dan Penny Bender Sebring. 2013. “The Use of Technology in Chicago Public Schools 2011 Perspectives from Students , Teachers , and Principals,” no. February, 1–42.
Enanoza, Feleeh L. 2023. “Lived Experiences of Teaching Interns in the Online Delivery of Instruction : A Psychological Study” 6:73–82.
Floyd, Kim K., and Sharon L. Judge. 2014. “The efficacy of assistive technology on reading comprehension for postsecondary students with learning disabilities.” Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits 8 (1): 48–64. https://www.atia.org/at-resources/atob/%5Cnhttps://www.atia.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/ATOBV8N1.pdf.
Hasudunganlubis, Andre, Syed Zulkarnain Syed Idrus, dan Asiah Sarji. 2018. “ICT usage amongst lecturers and its impact towards learning process quality.” Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication 34 (1): 284–99. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2018-3401-17.
Ishihara, Noriko, dan Andrew D Cohen. 2014. Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Routledge.
Kazu, İbrahim Yaşar. 2021. “The opinion of ELT students on technology-based classroom approach.” Focus on ELT Journal 3. https://doi.org/10.14744/felt.2021.00036.
Kumar, Sudeep. 2014. “Ethnographic Research : Holistic Understanding of Human Behaviour.” Jharkhand Journal of Development and Management Studies 12 (1): 5709–30.
Littlewood, William. 2014. “Communication-oriented language teaching: Where are we now? Where do we go from here?” Language Teaching 47 (3): 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000134.
Merriam, Sharan B, dan Elizabeth J Tisdell. 2015. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Morris, Michael, dan Shirley Maxey. 2014. “The Importance of English Language Competency in the Academic Success of International Accounting Students.” Journal of Education for Business 89 (4): 178–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2013.819315.
Sahed, Asmaa. 2020. “The Impact Of Digital Uses On Student Success Case Study Master Two Student At University Of Tiaret.” Université Ibn Khaldoun-Tiaret-.
Shittu, A. Tajudeen, Gambari, A. I. S Akam O. O. M. Adetayo . 2016. “Journal of science, technology, mathematics and education (jostmed)” 7 (August): 218–25.
Woottipong, Kretsai. 2022. “Facilitating Learners ’ Self -Regulated Learning Skills and Self-Efficacy to Write in English Using Technologies” 7 (1): 101–22. https://doi.org/10.35974/acuity.v7i1.2581.
Yu, Peter K. 2002. “Bridging the digital divide: Equality in the information age.” Cardozo Arts & Ent. LJ 20:1.
Zuniarti, Nemi, Urai Salam, dan Zainal Arifin. 2017. “Students’ motivation in learning English using song.” Tanjungpura University Pontianak, 1–10.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
