SURVEY, QUESTION, READ, RECITE AND REVIEW (SQ3R) TOWARDS STUDENTS’ READING ABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v13i1.12990Keywords:
SQ3R, Reading Ability, Narrative TextAbstract
This study aims to determine the effect of using Survey, Question, Read, Recite and Review (SQ3R) strategy on students’ reading comprehension skill in narrative text. This study is a pre – experimental research with one group pre – test post – test design. The population in this study were students in SMPN 8 Langsa and the sample of this study were students of class VIII consisting of 35 students, twenty male students and fifteen female students. The sample in this study was selected by using purposive sampling technique. This study used instruments in the form of reading test for pre – test and post – test. For the treatment, the SQ3R strategy was used in teaching narrative text. The data collected in this study was calculated by using SPSS version 22 with a significant value of 0.05. The result of this study revealed that the mean of pre – test was 44.29. After being given treatment, the average post – test increased significantly to 8.25 with a gain of 36.28. This means that the SQ3R strategy has a strong influence on students’ reading comprehension skill. It can be concluded that there was a significant improvement on students’ reading comprehension skill.
References
Amiruddin. (2022). The influence of SQ3R technique and students’ reading interest towards students’ reading comprehension achievement. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 3 (1): 60 – 66.
Apandi, S. (2011). Teaching reading by SQ3R technique to the second year of Junior high school students. Universitas Indraprasta PGRI. Retrieved on November 22, 2013.
Aris, S. (2014). 68 model pembelajaran inovatif dalam kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar – ruzz Media.
Asra, S. (2016, October). Using L1 retelling strategy to improve students’ comprehension in reading narrative text. In UNNES International Conference on ELTLT (English Language Teaching, Literature, and Translation) (pp. 685-692).
Bakhtiar, A. (2018). Improving students’ reading comprehension by using SQ3R method. Jurnal of English Language Teaching, 2 (2): 99 – 104.
Biringkanae, A. (2018). The use of SQ3R technique in improving studentsreading comprehension.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles an Alternative Approach to Language Pedagogy (2nd Eition). New York: A Person Education Company.
Edi, S. (2014). The effectiveness of extensive reading on students’ reading comprehension achievement as observed from students’ motivation. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 2(1): 54 – 58.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. (8th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentices Hall.
Kusumayanthi, S. & Maulidi, S. M. (2019). The implementation of SQ3R technique in teaching reading comprehension. The Journal of English Language Teaching, Literature, and Applied Linguistics (JELA), 1 (2): 74 – 80.
Maesaroh, S. (2021). SQ3R Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman Teks Nonfiksi. Indonesian Journal of Education and Learning, 4(2), 469-478.
Miller, M., & Veatch, N. (2010). Teaching literacy in context: choosing and using instructional strategies. The Reading Teacher, 64 (3): 154 – 165.
Pratiwi, S. I., Tahrun, T., & Firdaus, M. (2023). The correlations among metacognitive reading strategies, reading interest, and reading achievement of the eight grade students. EXPOSURE: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 12(1), 62-73.
Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in languaage teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suhailida, Asra, S., & Juliansyah, R. (2021). The application of speed reading technique in reading activity for Students of Senior High School 1 Kluet Selatan. Journal of Education, Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching, 4(02), 1-5.
Woolley, G., & Woolley, G. (2011). Reading comprehension (pp. 15-34). Springer Netherlands.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
