DEVELOPING READING MATERIAL IN THE FORM OF SHORT STORY BASED ON CENTRAL KALIMANTAN CULTURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v12i2.12822Keywords:
reading comprehension, material development, Central Kalimantan cultureAbstract
This research aims to develop reading materials in the form of short stories based on Central Kalimantan culture. Reading materials for university level in the form of local content are still limited. In fact, Dayak culture can be an interesting alternative reading material besides providing academic texts to students. Based on the needs analysis, it is known that at the English Education Study Program of Universitas Palangka Raya, there is a need for reading materials that are able to improve reading skills while containing relevant texts with text difficulty levels that are appropriate for student levels. Further, the reading materials should be in accordance with student interests and needs, contain effective learning strategies, and integrate culture or local content. This research applies Developmental Research in accordance with the ADDIE stages (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). Based on the Evaluation, the developed reading materials are in the form of short stories that contain Central Kalimantan cultural aspects embedded in activities, name of people, name of places, and name of food. The reading materials also contain exercises that demand students' skills in reading comprehension.References
Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.61.5.1
Agustina, L., Harahap, A., & Syahrial, S. (2018). Developing reading material based-on local culture for junior high school in Kabupaten Rejang Lebong. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 3(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.21608/pshj.2022.250026
Arifin, M. Z., Ulfa, S., & Praherdhiono, H. (2018). Pengembangan kurikulum muatan lokal Karawitan sebagai upaya mengkonstruksi pengetahuan dan pelestarian budaya Jawa di jenjang SMA. JKTP: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 1(2), 123–132.
Azizah, D. M., & Sugirin, S. (2019). Environment-based supplementary reading materials for junior high school students. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 8(1), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.32674/jise.v0i0.1034
Banks, J. A. (1993). An introduction to multicultural education. Allyn and Bacon.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_2438
Cab Calloway School of the Arts. (2019). Creative Writing Rubric. https://cabcallowayschool.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/CREATIVE-WRITING-RUBRIC-2019.pdf
Damaianti, V. S., Damaianti, L. F., & Mulyati, Y. (2017). Cultural literacy based critical reading teaching material with active reader strategy for junior high school. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 6(4), 312. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v6i4.10775
Dewi, N. L. P. E. S., & Batan, I. G. (2016). Kebutuhan akan muatan budaya lokal dalam suplemen perangkat pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris untuk menunjang pengembangan karakter bangsa. PRASI: Jurnal Bahasa, Seni, Dan Pengajarannya, 11(01), 4–22. http://digilib.mercubuana.ac.id/manager/t!@file_artikel_abstrak/Isi_Artikel_672852132064.pdf
Foorman, B. R., Smith, K. G., & Kosanovich, M. L. (2017). Rubric for evaluating reading/language arts instructional materials for kindergarten to grade 5. Institute of Education Sciences.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Pearson Education, Inc.
Laila, A., Budiningsih, A. C., & Syamsi, K. (2021). Textbooks based on local wisdom to improve reading and writing skills of elementary school students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(3), 886–892. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21683
Loyola Marymount University. (2008). Creative Writing Example Rubric. https://academics.lmu.edu/officeofassessment/resources/assessmentresources/rubrics/examplerubrics/creativewritingexamplerubric/
Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
Seli, S., Syafiri, D., & Indriani, I. (2022). Developing local based content supplementary reading material for Senior High School in Lubuklinggau. EDULIA: English Education, Linguistic, and Art Journal, 3(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31539/edulia.v3i1.5242
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
