CATALYSTS OF NEGOTIATION INITIATION IN EDUCATIONAL SETTINGS: AN EXPLORATION OF GENDER DYNAMICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v13i1.12773Keywords:
Catalysts, Negotiation Initiation, Educational Settings, Exploration, Gender DynamicsAbstract
The objective of the study are to investigate the negotiation style uses by Man and Women and the gender influence on the initiation of negotiation in educational conversation context. The research design used in this study is a qualitative descriptive research design. The researchers used the purposive sampling technique to select participants. Participant of this research were an 11 male students and 11 female students of English students of UKI Toraja. The instrument used are observation and interview. This study used the interactive model to analyze data. Data analysis techniques are carried out interactively and take place continuously until complete until the data is saturated. This study confirms that: 1) both male and female participants exhibit a prevalent utilization of the 'compete' negotiation style when initiating conversations within diverse social contexts. Specifically, this negotiation style encompasses proactive engagement in discussions for the explicit purpose of seeking information pertinent to the context. Notably, a higher proclivity for information-seeking through competing behavior is observed among female participants, while male participants tend to engage in conversations without introducing novel topics, emphasizing the nature of their engagement as oriented toward interaction rather than information acquisition. 2) The Influence of Gender Initiation within the Educational Conversation Context, Particularly in the Realms of Attaining Research Information: A Scholarly Exploration and Fostering Collaborative Engagement for Assignment Completion among Peers.
References
Aharoni, S. B. (2017). Who needs the women and peace hypothesis? Rethinking modes of inquiry on gender and conflict in Israel/Palestine. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 19(3), 311-326.
Azul, D., Hancock, A. B., Lundberg, T., Nygren, U., & Dhejne, C. (2022). Supporting well-being in gender-diverse people: a tutorial for implementing conceptual and practical shifts toward culturally responsive, person-centered care in speech-language pathology.
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 31(4), 1574-1587.
Babcock, L., Gelfand, M., Small, D., & Stayn, H. (2013). Gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations. In Social psychology and economics (pp. 239-259). Psychology Press.
Birmingham, P., & Wilkinson, D. (2003). Using research instruments: A guide for researchers. Routledge.
Chodorow, N. (2018). Family structure and feminine personality. In Feminism and philosophy (pp. 199-216). Routledge.
Cresswell, L., Hinch, R., & Cage, E. (2019). The experiences of peer relationships amongst autistic adolescents: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 61, 45-60.
Crossley, L., Woodworth, M., Black, P. J., & Hare, R. (2016). The dark side of negotiation: Examining the outcomes of face-to-face and computer-mediated negotiations among dark personalities. Personality and Individual Differences, 91, 47-51.
Deb, A. K., Haque, C. E., & Thompson, S. (2015). ‘Man can’t give birth, woman can't fish’: gender dynamics in the small-scale fisheries of Bangladesh. Gender, Place & Culture, 22(3), 305-324.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
Glenn, E. N. (2016). Social constructions of mothering: A thematic overview. Mothering, 1-29.
Griffin, R. W., & Phillips, J. (2023). Organizational behavior: Managing people and organizations. CENGAGE learning.
Kugler, K. G., Reif, J. A., Kaschner, T., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2018).
Gender differences in the initiation of negotiations: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 144(2), 198.
Madani, K., Pierce, T. W., & Mirchi, A. (2017). Serious games on environmental management. Sustainable cities and society, 29, 1-11.
Maltz, D. N., & Borker, R. A. (2018). A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In The matrix of language (pp. 81-98). Routledge.
Pink, S. (2020). Home truths: Gender, domestic objects and everyday life. Routledge.
Prawitha, F. R., Rahmawati, R., & Pradipta, B. M. (2023). Overview of Family Education and Culture: Masculinity Male Dancer. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Gemilang, 3(1), 26-47.
Riani, M., Perrotta, D., & Torti, F. (2012). FSDA: A MATLAB toolbox for robust analysis and interactive data exploration. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 116, 17-32.
Schneider, M. C., & Bos, A. L. (2019). The application of social role theory to the study of gender in politics. Political Psychology, 40, 173-213.
Sumerau, J. E., & Cragun, R. T. (2015). The hallmarks of righteous women: Gendered background expectations in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. Sociology of Religion, 76(1), 49-71.
Tagg, C., & Seargeant, P. (2014). Audience design and language choice in the construction and maintenance of translocal communities on social network sites. In The language of social media: Identity and community on the internet (pp. 161-185). Springer.
Ubaydullayeva, M. (2022). Socio-Cultural Notions of Gender Dynamics in Linguistic Researches. Академические исследования в современной науке, 1(15), 149-152.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
