SOME FUNDAMENTAL THEORIES OF CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Fariza Azkiya Ali Universitas Lancang Kuning

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v7i1.1068

Abstract

This paper study explains about some fundamental theories of Critical Discourse Analysis such as focus on dominance relations by elite groups and institutions as they are being ordained and the overt sociopolitical stance of discourse analysis. Context social structure: Situations of discursive interaction are similarly part or constitutive of social structure; for example, a press conference may be a typical repetition of organizations and media institutions. That is, “local” and more “global” contexts are closely related, and both exercise constraints on discourse. Personal and social cognition: Language users as social actors have both personal and social cognition: personal memories, knowledge and opinions, as well as those shared with members of the group or culture as a whole. Both types of cognition influence interaction 006 and discourse of individual members, whereas shared “social representations” govern the collective actions of a group.

References

Hamuddin, B. (2012). A comparative study of politeness strategies in economic journals (Doctoral dissertation, University of Malaya).

Hamuddin, B., & Noor, F. N. M. (2015, August). A Closer Look on Politeness Strategies in Malaysian Economic Journal. In 2nd INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON LINGUISTICS (p. 52).

Van Dijk, Teun A. 2015. Principle of Critical Discourse Analysis: Amsterdam. University of Amsterdam

Downloads

Published

2018-05-21

Issue

Section

Articles